I don't recall how good he was stopping the run, but if it was Frost vs. Woodson one-v-one in the open field, I'm betting Frosty would have just steamrolled him. Two or three hits like that and I'm thinking Woodson would have shied away a little bit. Maybe a big bit.Someone tried to tell me that Woodsen would have had a HUGE impact on this one. I told him "Woodsen was a great player and still is. But since Nebraska was likely to pass MAYBE 5 times that whole game, I think his impact would have been very minimal."
Does anyone have a video of where Frost made that devastating block against Tennessee?I don't recall how good he was stopping the run, but if it was Frost vs. Woodson one-v-one in the open field, I'm betting Frosty would have just steamrolled him. Two or three hits like that and I'm thinking Woodson would have shied away a little bit. Maybe a big bit.Someone tried to tell me that Woodsen would have had a HUGE impact on this one. I told him "Woodsen was a great player and still is. But since Nebraska was likely to pass MAYBE 5 times that whole game, I think his impact would have been very minimal."
Yeah, A&M. That was awesome!Does anyone have a video of where Frost made that devastating block against Tennessee?I don't recall how good he was stopping the run, but if it was Frost vs. Woodson one-v-one in the open field, I'm betting Frosty would have just steamrolled him. Two or three hits like that and I'm thinking Woodson would have shied away a little bit. Maybe a big bit.Someone tried to tell me that Woodsen would have had a HUGE impact on this one. I told him "Woodsen was a great player and still is. But since Nebraska was likely to pass MAYBE 5 times that whole game, I think his impact would have been very minimal."
What's also funny is that 96% of Nebraska thinks the Huskers would have won while only 74% of Michigan think the Wolverines would have won.Anyone else have a laugh about the regional split in voting outcome? I mean, it's understandable and expected, but its a near perfect map of the big 10 that has Michigan beating Nebraska.
What, that we are unapologetic homers?! I jest. 96% of NE got it right. I wouldn't have it any other way. All this talk of the days of yore have me really aching to watch 5 freakishly athletic fatmen run people over. I can't wait for the return of the power run game. Those were the days... :wastedWhat's also funny is that 96% of Nebraska thinks the Huskers would have won while only 74% of Michigan think the Wolverines would have won.Anyone else have a laugh about the regional split in voting outcome? I mean, it's understandable and expected, but its a near perfect map of the big 10 that has Michigan beating Nebraska.
That'll tell you something right there.
On merit if that one play only ... Stewart's was better. However ...Why is Flutie's hail mary always better than Stewart's? I understand it was against Miami, but Stewart threw that ball almost 80 yards.
... and Washington thinks Nebraska would have won.I notice Tennessee is decidedly in Nebraska's camp.