The 2020 Attrition Thread

Decked said:
And it’s before spring. We are sitting at 84. Gifford gets one. You’d have to think there will be another few scholarship guys leave between now and after spring ball.
Click to expand...
Gifford's will count toward the 85, but not toward the 2020 25 limit.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ziebol said:
Bradley has entered the portal.
Click to expand...
Bradley looked good in the spring game when he had room.  Somewhat ordinary when running in traffic.  With a new crop of RBs, his opportunity to see the field were certainly diminishing.  Wish him the best of luck where ever he end's up.

 
Skeeball said:
Bradley looked good in the spring game when he had room.  Somewhat ordinary when running in traffic.  With a new crop of RBs, his opportunity to see the field were certainly diminishing.  Wish him the best of luck where ever he end's up.
Click to expand...


Yeah, he was fun to watch in the Spring Game. I was hoping that was a snapshot of his upward progress, turned out to be his highlight reel. Hope he finds a fit and gets to produce on the field. Good luck to him.

 
N is for nowledge said:
Sorry meant to say pissed.  Many on here were against transition non contributors out under any circumstance less than a felony charge.  This gives them and us the best situation to succeed.
Click to expand...


To be clear, most were not in agreement with the way you phrased how they left. People just expect a certain amount of dignity to the process, that's all.

 
knapplc said:
To be clear, most were not in agreement with the way you phrased how they left. People just expect a certain amount of dignity to the process, that's all.
Click to expand...
To be clear, there was plenty of dignity as I phrased it.  Non contributors need a helping hand to other opportunities.  I didn’t say bring them in say thanks, scholarship is gone good luck.  I made it clear we should assist in finding them another SCHOLARSHIP opportunity, might not be d1 but they will have a scholarship somewhere.  Pretty straightforward and shouldn’t have been controversial at all.  I’m just glad to see it’s being done finally.

 
I think scholarships should have to be renewed on a yearly basis. If a player lacks value to the team, or has lost the confidence of the coaches, they should be moved off of an athletic scholarship. Perhaps there should be a way for them to continue their education on a non-athletic scholarship, but I hate the idea of a 4+ year "guarantee" for young athletes who may or may not deserve it.

 
307husker said:
I think scholarships should have to be renewed on a yearly basis. If a player lacks value to the team, or has lost the confidence of the coaches, they should be moved off of an athletic scholarship. Perhaps there should be a way for them to continue their education on a non-athletic scholarship, but I hate the idea of a 4+ year "guarantee" for young athletes who may or may not deserve it.
Click to expand...


The Big Ten wholeheartedly disagrees.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top