Robsker attacks fans for ingratitude to team; His attack is not founded in facts, but hyperbole. all the proof you need is the consecutive sell out of the stadium remains intact. Count the turnstyle robsker.
people vote with thier wallets. You are like a mouthpiece of the new left, always seeking to find a scapegoat.What better scapegoat than question the loyalty of a fan base beyond your hyperbole.
Husker football isnt going anywhere that this fan bases has not seen before. Afterall we've always had opponents in every game, we've seen bad coaching in victory and defeat. Every game at home or on the road has been watched critically by most of us.
We dont even need claims such as We'll be back" truth is we never left.
We know good football by our tradition, including the battles of the 70's when we couldnt get past the Sooners, no we are an educated fan, schooled in both adversity and success.
we dont need no mouthpieces, to describe our intent.
We are what we are, and will make no apologies for it.
your attempt to add baggage to the equation has failed.
Very interesting response.
First, there was no attack. Ingratitude, while perhaps part of what I have in view, is a minor component. Dedication to the team was never questioned. By the way, an argument cannot be based on hyperbole as set against fact --- an argument can be exaggerated and embellished and that would hedge towards hyperbole. So, the misuse of terms makes it unclear as to what you are trying to say --- but it is clear you do not agree. Fair enough. Anyway, the facts, subjective as they are, are that Husker fans --- at least a subset of them --- have shown that when they lose they cry like babies as if the world was crashing in and they in turn call for the heads of everyone who was responsible (and many do so in most unpleasant ways) Such is not right, reaonsable or what we should ascribe to.
For the record, I am not PC and have no problem expressing opinions or hearing those of others. I have written 20 posts stating that this staff must go. I was on the leading edge of that movement --- while most on this board were still on the Callahan bandwagon (or were wavering) I was fully stating that coaching was the problem. While this staff should (and I think will) go, I nonetheless think (at least as far as I can tell) that Callahan worked his butt off. I assume the same for his staff (though cannot dogmatically say whether it is true). They deserve to be commended for their efforts. They deserve reasonable treatment. They were not evil. They were not purposeful in what came to pass. They just failed. So, we replace them.
Rather than an attack, this has been a call to fix our attitudes, not have such a sense of entitlement, treat those who served their best in a civil manner and be gracious in both victory and defeat. We will get plenty of practice at dealing with defeat and so lets learn how to do it well. No one wants to lose --- but when one does, it is there (over and against in victory) where character is on display.
Tom Osborne was and is an awesome man (coach) not because he won (although he did do that) but because he both won and lost very well. He was civil, poised, appreciative, humble and generous in both victory and defeat. We as a fan base should look to TO, a model of integrity, and support our program in like fashion.
As for the mouthpiece of the new left --- wow. You would have to see my voting record and my positions on social, spiritual and political issues --- if you did, you would see that I as right-wing as one can almost be.