The Courts (not specific to either party)

[FrantzHardySwag]

Clarence Thomas needs to resign.

At the very least he should recuse from any jan 6 cases. The fact that he was trying to block jan 6 documents from being released, when he wife was directly involved - is a f#&%ing joke. 

 

[DevoHusker]

The reaction was term limits for Presidents. 

Haha! True that

 

[Guy Chamberlin]

It's not illegal to be the laziest, most incurious, least participatory, and 100% partisan Supreme Court Justice, or to be married to a treasonous s#!t-disturber, but I think we should get rid of Clarence Thomas anyway. 

 

[RedDenver]

So he didn’t do anything illegal.  Thank you for clarifying.  
 

And no I wouldn’t.  Because the judge wouldn’t have done anything illegal.  

Aren't you the poster that keeps bringing up Hunter Biden?

 

[Scarlet]

So he didn’t do anything illegal.  Thank you for clarifying.  
 

And no I wouldn’t.  Because the judge wouldn’t have done anything illegal.  

You asked two questions didn't you?  

 

[Archy1221]

Aren't you the poster that keeps bringing up Hunter Biden?

Yes, did he recently become a Supreme Court justice?  If not, then your relevancy is deeply questioned for bringing him up.  Or should I just post a squirrel meme? 

 

[RedDenver]

Yes, did he recently become a Supreme Court justice?  If not, then your relevancy is deeply questioned for bringing him up.  Or should I just post a squirrel meme? 

Intentionally missing the forest for the trees is still missing the forest for the trees.

 

[knapplc]

 

[DevoHusker]

[No message]

 

[knapplc]

People praised Ted Bundy, too.

 

[suh_fan93]

SCOTUS has lost all credibility.  

 

[knapplc]

Expand the court. Do it now. 

 

[knapplc]

So these Neanderthals assert that:

1) Women have no innate human right to determine what happens to their own body

and 

2) It is an innate human right right to carry a man-made device 

 

[BigRedBuster]

So these Neanderthals assert that:

1) Women have no innate human right to determine what happens to their own body

and 

2) It is an innate human right right to carry a man-made device 

And, it's state's rights to determine abortion rights....but not state's rights to determine who should be allowed to carry guns in public.

 

[knapplc]

And in case you had any illusions that the right of gays to be married (Obergefell) isn't next, it's written into this travesty of a ruling: