How bout all that Diaco hype?? Man he was terrible at coaching defense here. Its beyond explination.
I agree that Banker was probably scapegoated and it was probably to buy more time. He was neither a terrible DC or a great DC. I don’t think our players ever achieved defensive stats as good as the less talented beavers under Banker. The buyin excuse was believable since it seemed obvious that something (wrong) was going on.I agree with that...I feel like Banker was a scapegoat. At least he had a clear plan STOP THE RUN...Coach Bobby was sort of exposed.
If there had been no hype for Lee or Diaco do you think last year would’ve been easier to swallow?
When Wiscy switched to 3-4 their defense improved year 1. Ours fell off a cliff. I’m cautiously optimistic about Chinander.Very true, and I bought the hype. I thought our defense was going to look like something we see out of Wisconsin. Our defense this year will resemble more what they do at Wisconsin than what Diaco put out there. He didn't put the defense into any type of a position to be successful.
Lee wasn't very good at Tulane, suddenly coming to NU, i saw no hype.....only hope.The only real danger with hype is players/coaches might not live up to the hype.
So not very dangerous at all, as far as dangerous things go.
It's possible, however I think an equally significant problem wasn't so much the hype but the colossal failure of a result. People would've expected some struggles from the defense, and perhaps even some struggles from Tanner Lee. The fact that Diaco's defense was so bad and Lee struggled so much at times is what makes it so baffling.If there had been no hype for Lee or Diaco do you think last year would’ve been easier to swallow?
The OP is about an interview of Tanner Lee's mother where she talks about how dangerous hype can be in relation to the preseason hype surrounding the guy. It's not an attempt to derail the thread... it's what the thread is about.
I thought using Nebraska as the subject for the dangers of hype was odd. Yes, there were a few boos directed at Lee, specifically at the Northern Illinois game when he was so obviously not ready to compete, but Riley kept putting him out there. The fans around us (us included) just wanted him benched for a series or two if for no other reason than to clear his head, but whatever. Yeah, I'm sure it's hard for a mom to hear boos directed at her kid, but if I'm writing an article about how bad fans can be toward their own players, Nebraska isn't the place I'm starting.
Yeah, I realized that once I saw "Tanner Lee," I had flashbacks of pick sixes and drifted off to another thread, lol. I simply blame MR and his staff and the media for hyping the kid up before he ever took a snap in uniform for us. It was completely unfair to him.
When Wiscy switched to 3-4 their defense improved year 1. Ours fell off a cliff. I’m cautiously optimistic about Chinander.
And it didn't help that Billy Devaney said he was a first round pick before Spring ball even started...Agreed. The media were watching practice and all up in his jock about every throw. They were the major fuel for that fire, and I recall just before the season started that Langsdorf said like a week before the first game that they needed to ramp down the crazy expectations.
The fans don't watch practice, they only go off what the media tells them, and I think it was McKewon from the OWH who chastised the fans/media for that Tanner Lee hype - in that order.
Yeah, I am not expecting miracles, but I would rather see a defense attack, make plays and be disruptive even though they most likely will get burnt a few times a game for it. That is much better than the passive keep everything in front and let them take 10 plays and score.
Yes. A thousand times yes. Go hit somebody for the love of Bob Devaney's Ghost.