Guy Chamberlin
Well-known member
Ha, this is pretty hilarious. CA is basically funding the current riots :facepalm:
Even your source admits none of this has been verified yet.
Ha, this is pretty hilarious. CA is basically funding the current riots :facepalm:
I assume you mean the “hands up don’t shoot” shooting of which the hands up don’t shoot was shown to be false and even Eric Holder of all people was forced to admit the shooting was justified and certainly not murder. That one? I do often wonder if the aggressive response was because cops were tired of getting killed during the protests?The people in the year 2015 would already have witnessed the riots in Ferguson, Missouri after the murder of a Black man by police, and protesters who faced a surprisingly aggressive response from a suburban police force that had been militarized with advanced weaponry and riot control sold on the cheap by the Pentagon
Hey, you rationalize these rioters anyway you see fit. I’m certainly not gonna stop you and I actually encourage you to do more of it.
I assume you mean the “hands up don’t shoot” shooting of which the hands up don’t shoot was shown to be false and even Eric Holder of all people was forced to admit the shooting was justified and certainly not murder. That one? I do often wonder if the aggressive response was because cops were tired of getting killed during the protests?
https://www.stlpr.org/government-politics-issues/2015-03-24/why-did-the-justice-department-conclude-that-hands-up-dont-shoot-was-a-myth
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/eric-holder-shooting-of-cops-in-ferguson-inexcusable-and-repugnant/
Yes, that one. The same one where the DOJ, after exonerating Darren Wilson and debunking the 'hands up don't shoot' narrative, also found that the Ferguson police department and courts routinely violated the Constitution and federal law with a pattern of rampant racial bias and discrimination, unreasonable force, intentional discrimination, and mistreatment of detainees for years.
The flashpoint incident didn't happen the way people thought, but there nonetheless existed a tower of racist kindling soaked in excessive force gasoline and lit cigarette butts of discrimination and harassment that lended itself to being quite easily ignited.
Good. So we are in agreement “ hands up don’t shoot” was a myth and Michael Brown wasn’t murdered like Guy claimed.Yes, that one. The same one where the DOJ, after exonerating Darren Wilson and debunking the 'hands up don't shoot' narrative
My guess is people would think those Jan 6 rioters assaulting police and damaging the Capitol were bat s#!t crazy.It would be silly whataboutism to bring up J6 at every turn but.....uhm....what do you suppose that person from 2015 would think about the Capitol Insurrection in 2021 in that moment when Trump was first announcing his candidacy?
Doing nothing and letting ICE do extremely unpopular and largely theatrical immigration "raids" is by far the best option.Another option is to do nothing.
Immigration is actually one area Trump is positive on.Doing nothing and letting ICE do extremely unpopular and largely theatrical immigration "raids" is by far the best option.
The more unpopular Trump is, the more Democrats win by in 2026. By 2028, if we still let Trump be and do unpopular things, Democrats have a small but realistic chance to win the Senate and with it a Trifecta.
As a counterpoint, ethically, opposing bad is good.Doing nothing and letting ICE do extremely unpopular and largely theatrical immigration "raids" is by far the best option.
The more unpopular Trump is, the more Democrats win by in 2026. By 2028, if we still let Trump be and do unpopular things, Democrats have a small but realistic chance to win the Senate and with it a Trifecta.
No, you don't understand. We shouldn't oppose bad things because it might, possibly, maybe make winning a future election harder. Cause that's better somehow.As a counterpoint, ethically, opposing bad is good.
Doing nothing and letting ICE do extremely unpopular and largely theatrical immigration "raids" is by far the best option.
The more unpopular Trump is, the more Democrats win by in 2026. By 2028, if we still let Trump be and do unpopular things, Democrats have a small but realistic chance to win the Senate and with it a Trifecta.
Remember when Martin Luther King Jr burned cars in the streets and threw bricks at police while chucking bikes and rocks off of overpasses at cars?Remember when centrist Democrats told Martin Luther King Jr. to tone down the civil rights protests because -- although they were totally sympathetic to the cause -- seeing negroes in the street was hurting John F. Kennedy and the Southern Dems electoral chances, and Martin Luther King Jr. said "good point" and just let the southern racists do their worst?
I don't.
I mean, if you think the civil rights movements of the 1960s and resist Trump 2.0 are the same, by all means, be prepared to watch in horror as the Trump resistance implodes.Remember when centrist Democrats told Martin Luther King Jr. to tone down the civil rights protests because -- although they were totally sympathetic to the cause -- seeing negroes in the street was hurting John F. Kennedy and the Southern Dems electoral chances, and Martin Luther King Jr. said "good point" and just let the southern racists do their worst?
I don't.
I'm not disagreeing but winning elections is better. If you want to oppose bad, my recommendation is to win so we're the ones that nominate who leads ICE and control the institutions of power.As a counterpoint, ethically, opposing bad is good.