how can you say that? what would it have been if we lost? i am being absolutely serious. if a win is a 'complete wreck', what would a loss have been. it cannot be more of a wreck than a 'complete wreck'. you cannot have more of something if it is 'complete'. you want a complete wreck, go to espn3.com and watch ucla at tu, that was a complete wreck.
We run the Zone Read WAY TOO MUCH! Does Watson know anything else besides that formation? We ran the ball down Washintons throats last week and most of the time out of the zone read. Shawn Watson is relying on Martinez too much to lead this offense.
The Husker game was terrible to those of us who listened to every second or watched every second. But guys like Kirk didn't pay any attention to it other than what was coming across on the bottom line. Our game, from a national perspective, was completely overshadowed by Bama-Arkansas, the Texas loss, the OU close win, BSU-OSU, and South Carolina-Auburn. At the end of the day, with all those storylines, all that most voters will see is, "Well Nebraska won again." They will probably stay right in that 5-7 area in the polls.
no, i am not joking. see the bold section of the original post. what would the equivalent to losing to a winless fcs team? the effort is pathetic, but, and again i am being serious, how is it a "complete" wreck and what would a loss have been?
I wasn't a math major, but 4-0 is not the same as 3-1. Even Texass fans would agree today!
Would you rather have a bad game of the year against an FCS team, or @ Iowa State and lose, or @ Okie State or @ A&M? A win is a win, let's all get over it, we are still undefeated that's all that matters.
Yes that is all that matters. The hangover excuse is ridiclious. I would rather use the excuse of looking ahead to KState or Texas.
yea but that's all that was in my head while i was at the game, in disbelief of what the heck was going on, I couldn't believe it. It just blew me away. SDSU had a good following too.
