She probably doesn’t play craps so she probably doesn’t know that her example isn’t helping her cause even though we know what she is trying to get across.
take a straight line time log over the history of the Earth. Those 500 yr floods she talked about aren’t supposed to happen just once every 500 years like clockwork. Over time, on average, it’s a 500 year event (or so we say). There could have been a 2000 years where the flood didn’t happen, but three times over a 500 year span where it did happen.
Same with craps. The odds of rolling box cars is 2.78% over time. However, there are plenty of instances were boxcars have been rolled 2 or three times in a row (I hit snake eyes four of five rolls last weekend). Using craps as her example, she is showing the randomness of relative short term events.
Sorry about your gambling problem.
Hey...don't crap (get it) on gambling.She understood this perfectly well, and is indeed trying to illustrate the randomness and chaos of weather prediction, while acknowledging we are in a period of accelerating chaos.
While you can roll boxcars three times in a row and then not, you can't melt a glacier one day and have it restored the next.
Sorry about your gambling problem.
That's really unnecessary.
Who has a problem?She understood this perfectly well, and is indeed trying to illustrate the randomness and chaos of weather prediction, while acknowledging we are in a period of accelerating chaos.
While you can roll boxcars three times in a row and then not, you can't melt a glacier one day and have it restored the next.
Sorry about your gambling problem.
That’s a very good thing on a crapless table.I hit snake eyes three rolls in a row once in Vegas.
I've also played craps four times in my entire life.