For starters, most of this discussion is based around a domestic violence incident which is probably held to be more egregious than quite of few - not all - of the other incidents so lumping them all together doesn't really work. I don't know exactly what happened or what became of every one but I doubt every one of them should have been kicked off the team. Should whatever punishment that was handed out been harsher? Possibly/probably.Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.This part I would disagree with. I'm pretty sure TO has stated that he thought it would help LP overcome him upbringing and give him a better chance in life.
Now you can choose not to believe that if you want or say that was misguided or not a good enough reason but it's definitely plausible.
How many times was Osborne "fooled?"
Riley Washington
Lawrence Phillips
Christian Peter
Tyrone Williams
Just off the top of my head. And that's the ones we publicly know about. My cousin was a high-ranking official in the State Patrol during the 1980s. Were the matters public, I could cite many, many more names of players involved in incidents throughout Osborne's career as head coach.
It's fine to remember Osborne's career with fondness. Let's just not be fooled about what the man was, or how he ran his ship.
But the statement was there was not other plausible reason why Osborne didn't suspend Phillips other than to win the National Championship. I think that statement is flatly false. There are definitely other plausible reasons, regardless of their perceived validity.