The P&R Plague Thread (Covid-19)

Scarlet said:
Ok so what crimes, sins, whatever are you accusing Fauci of doing that by you doing so God would approve?  Can you also provide the prosecuting authority who might be pressing the charges or any current indictments, please?  I mean someone beyond Gym Jordan and his ilk. 
Click to expand...
when you believe Gym Jordan you will believe anything

 
Taking the video within its scope, it's the "can't recalls" as the emphasis.   Not debating the crimes possibly alluded to in the video.  

Apparently an unprecedented count.  Curious why?

 
DefenderAO said:
Taking the video within its scope, it's the "can't recalls" as the emphasis.   Not debating the crimes possibly alluded to in the video.  

Apparently an unprecedented count.  Curious why?
Click to expand...
So you're making accusations based on the cut video you posted that doesn't have any rebuttal questions in it and the "can't recalls" ?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
DefenderAO said:
Here you go

Supplemental
Click to expand...
Jeff Landry...lol.  

You're doing your cryptic dance again. 

So what actual crimes are you accusing Fauci of doing? 

This?

'Federal bureaucrats in collusion with social media companies want to control not only what you think, but especially what you say,” said Attorney General Landry. “During no time in human history was this more obvious than during the COVID-19 crisis where social engineering tactics were used against the American public, not to limit your exposure to a virus, but to limit your exposure to information that did not fit within a government sanctioned narrative.”
Click to expand...


Because that doesn't seem bias now does it?

 
Scarlet said:
Jeff Landry...lol.  

You're doing your cryptic dance again. 

So what actual crimes are you accusing Fauci of doing? 

This?

Because that doesn't seem bias now does it?
Click to expand...
Fauci is doing a great job of avoiding declaratives or position statements..."cannot recall."

You mean limited exposure that didn't fit the narrative like this?




 
Are we talking about the same skeptics and accountability warriors who insisted COVID was no worse than the flu, that it would be over by Easter, that the vaccine was an excuse to microchip us, and who swallowed every alternative cure thrown out by their idiot President and lab-coated shills without evidence?

 
I will say Nancy Mace handles herself better and makes a far more convincing case than her showboating Republican colleagues. 

The irony, of course, is that Elon Musk has liberated Twitter from ill-advised liberal censorship and put back the misleading conservative content that sparked the censorship in the first place. 

Remember when Elon Musk in his first 24 hours as the owner of Twitter tweeted out the totally unfounded rumor that Paul Pelosi had not been attacked by an intruder, but by a gay hook-up gone wrong? That was how he chose to celebrate his new Twitter? 

Twitter definitely needed to review their content standards.  But anyone who utters the words "thank God for Elon Musk" isn't exactly interested in truth or skepticism. 

 
22 minutes ago, DefenderAO said:

Fauci is doing a great job of avoiding declaratives or position statements..."cannot recall."

You mean limited exposure that didn't fit the narrative like this?

Click to expand...



Are you sure your accusations are accurate and that, when and if they ever show up in a court of law, they will hold up?  Because I'm pretty sure there are passages in the Bible warning about making false accusations.  I mean if we're going to parade around claiming the moral high ground.  

 
  • Plus1
Reactions: GSG
Scarlet said:
Are you sure your accusations are accurate and that, when and if they ever show up in a court of law, they will hold up?  Because I'm pretty sure there are passages in the Bible warning about making false accusations.  I mean if we're going to parade around claiming the moral high ground.  
Click to expand...
What accusations are you talking about?  The Landry transcript?  The video?  

 
Guy Chamberlin said:
I will say Nancy Mace handles herself better and makes a far more convincing case than her showboating Republican colleagues. 

The irony, of course, is that Elon Musk has liberated Twitter from ill-advised liberal censorship and put back the misleading conservative content that sparked the censorship in the first place. 

Remember when Elon Musk in his first 24 hours as the owner of Twitter tweeted out the totally unfounded rumor that Paul Pelosi had not been attacked by an intruder, but by a gay hook-up gone wrong? That was how he chose to celebrate his new Twitter? 

Twitter definitely needed to review their content standards.  But anyone who utters the words "thank God for Elon Musk" isn't exactly interested in truth or skepticism. 
Click to expand...
Agree she does a pretty good job.

Do you agree with the censorship?   And look who they censored.  Are you saying there is no credence to contrarian views?  

And to the other point, it was very clear they were going to run this thing as long as possible.  "Over by Easter."  No chance that was happening.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
NebraskaHarry said:
Define slyly
Click to expand...





search_grey600_24dp.png













 
 
 
 






sly·ly


/ˈslīlē/


https://www.google.com/search?clien...2ahUKEwj1y4z16ZX-AhXPmmoFHSouBpEQ3eEDegQIGRAK





 





adverb






  1. in a cunning and deceitful or manipulative manner.

    "they slyly manipulate situations to their own favor"












    • in a way that suggests some secret knowledge that may be harmful or embarrassing; knowingly.

      "he smiled slyly, unable to mask a look of triumph"















 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top