The Peso Defense

This sure helps explain mendoa moving to corner. That's not a joke on the hispanic name since gomes and hagg won't be playing corner, he gives cb some of the depth lost by the move.
I know the coaches were considering moving Hagg to safety, but I thought I read somewhere that only Gomes and West were moving to the safety position. Did I read something incorrectly or something?

And technically, Hagg isn't a CB, he's the nickel back (and I'm not talking about the crappy band).

 
This sure helps explain mendoa moving to corner. That's not a joke on the hispanic name since gomes and hagg won't be playing corner, he gives cb some of the depth lost by the move.
I know the coaches were considering moving Hagg to safety, but I thought I read somewhere that only Gomes and West were moving to the safety position. Did I read something incorrectly or something?

And technically, Hagg isn't a CB, he's the nickel back (and I'm not talking about the crappy band).
It sounds like Hagg is just going to be the "monster" type back in the peso defense. Basically he will remain the nickel back. It sounds like he is out of the running for the safety spot . . . probably because he is so valuable at the nickel.

 
This sure helps explain mendoa moving to corner. That's not a joke on the hispanic name since gomes and hagg won't be playing corner, he gives cb some of the depth lost by the move.
I know the coaches were considering moving Hagg to safety, but I thought I read somewhere that only Gomes and West were moving to the safety position. Did I read something incorrectly or something?

And technically, Hagg isn't a CB, he's the nickel back (and I'm not talking about the crappy band).
Either way with all the moves the depth at corner is reduced. I'm hoping that Mendoza can get some playing time, and add a little production to the potential we've all heard so much about.

 
Wow, the peso = currency just like nickel/dime/quarter/dollar connection completely flew over my head the first go around. Thanks to everyone who explained it to me. Slow day... :facepalm: I was wondering what the heck huKser was talking about at first...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So who do we expect to be out on the field with this scheme if we had to estimate right now, and at which positions?
The way I'd see this package shaping up:

Meredith - Steinkuhler - Crick - Allen

Who knows on the LBs... any two of Martin, David, Compton, Fisher or May

Hagg as the "peso back"

Dennard - Gomes - Smith - Amukamara

 
So who do we expect to be out on the field with this scheme if we had to estimate right now, and at which positions?
The way I'd see this package shaping up:

Meredith - Steinkuhler - Crick - Allen

Who knows on the LBs... any two of Martin, David, Compton, Fisher or May

Hagg as the "peso back"

Dennard - Gomes - Smith - Amukamara
Is nobody mentioning David just because he's not here for spring practice? I thought he was almost a lock for playing time since he's JuCo.

 
Think David might become primarily our Dime LB, whenever the coaches decide to put that 6th DB in, he'll be manning the middle. He's probably going to be the most athletic LB next year and he's shown that he can be pretty good in coverage, but I don't think he'll be big enough to crack the line-up for the base set. Give him the full year to put the pounds on, get stronger, get faster and come back and own his Senior year.

 
It sounds like Hagg is just going to be the "monster" type back in the peso defense. Basically he will remain the nickel back. It sounds like he is out of the running for the safety spot . . . probably because he is so valuable at the nickel.
Goood. I really like this defensive coaching staff. They are good at evaluating the talent they have and then deciding where that talent should go to put the best product on the field.

However, I guess I'm not sure what makes the Peso D different than the nickel package. It sounds like the same thing to me.

 
Wow, the peso = currency just like nickel/dime/quarter/dollar connection completely flew over my head the first go around. Thanks to everyone who explained it to me. Slow day... :facepalm: I was wondering what the heck huKser was talking about at first...

I blame NAFTA

 
Hopefully the staff addresses the issue with the running game raised in this article:

http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_the_peso_leave_nu_shortc.html

Could the Peso Leave NU Shortchanged?16 comments so far MARCH 31, 2010 by STEVE HANWAY

When your defense sees a lot of three, four, and even five wide receiver sets, it makes sense to play an extra defensive back or two to keep from being picked apart in the passing game due to unfavorable matchups. But what about the running game? In the aftermath of the 62-36 debacle in Boulder in 2001, the NU coaches admitted that they didn't do enough to prepare their team for the power run game. They'd seen so much of the spread offense (including the one they successfully shut down against defending national champion Oklahoma that year) that most of their practice time had been devoted to defending the pass. So could history repeat itself in an unwelcome way if Nebraska gets too focused on matching up against the spread?

Think back to the game against Kansas this year. The box score lies a bit about the impact of big back Toben Opurum, a 235-pound freshman for the Jayhawks. With KU trailing the Huskers 10-0, the Jayhawks rode Opurum to a 17-16 lead. On their first scoring drive, Opurum converted two fourth downs and made some other solid runs. Then on the ensuing field goal drive, Opurum converted a critical 3rd and 1. On their final touchdown drive, he again converted a 3rd and 1 situation in addition to some other key runs. The Jayhawks went away from Opurum after that and perhaps not coincidentally failed to score another point. That was a night where Nebraska opened the game with six defensive backs on the field.

In what was effectively the Big 12 North title game against Kansas State, the 227-pound Daniel Thomas provided over half of the offense by the Wildcats. Thomas managed 99 yards (without a loss) on 19 carries and another 51 yards on four catches. He was really the only offensive player to give the Huskers trouble and that was on a night where Nebraska often played five defensive backs.

Against Iowa State, 232-pound Jeremiah Schwartz gained the only two yards on ISU's opening field goal drive (which was decisive) and a few more on the Cyclones only touchdown drive. He also carried the ball to eat clock and help with field position as ISU hung on to shock Nebraska. No, he didn't have nearly as much to do with the outcome as the eight Husker fumbles, but he did play an important role in the upset. That was another game where NU started in the nickel.

The 225-pound Derrick Washington of Missouri racked up 90 of the 225 total yards that Missouri had against the Huskers in another game where NU played six defensive backs. He had two carries to set up Missouri's lone touchdown just before halftime. He carried the ball four times on the Tiger's field goal drive.

The point of rehashing all this is just to highlight one element of nickel, dime, or "peso" defenses. They aren't necessarily the ideal personnel package for stopping a big running back. But when that big back is lined up with three wide receivers, you have to pick your poison. Hopefully, the Blackshirts will again have the antidote particularly in the Big 12 North. It's also good to see that NU can line up the same way with big Dontrayevous Robinson. Those opposing defenses may not be quite ready for him either.
 
That's a great article, especially since once you submit your lineup you're not allowed to substitute players in and out. Once we install that Peso system, there's no way to bring in a third linebacker.

:facepalm:

 
i understand its the offseason, but still...way too much is being made of this i believe. Its not like this is some new major development. Youre going to have two legit linebackers, and a guy like Hagg lining up next to them on the the strong side or wherever hes needed. Names changed, but the song remains the same.

And kudos to knapplc...my sentiments exactly.

 
i understand its the offseason, but still...way too much is being made of this i believe. Its not like this is some new major development. Youre going to have two legit linebackers, and a guy like Hagg lining up next to them on the the strong side or wherever hes needed. Names changed, but the song remains the same.
And that's the key. Hagg makes this defense possible. Without a guy who could legitimately double as a LB while playing Safety, The Bros. Pelini aren't fool enough to run this defense.

I wouldn't be surprised that if Hagg gets hurt, we go back to a 4-3.

 
Back
Top