If anything I see more Republicans losing their minds and freaking out over the EC than anyone . Without that they would have lost 2 more elections , and under a popular vote system they may never win another . They know that and they’re scared .
If anything I see more Republicans losing their minds and freaking out over the EC than anyone . Without that they would have lost 2 more elections , and under a popular vote system they may never win another . They know that and they’re scared .
It's honestly hard to imagine that the Republican party as it's existed the last 15-20 or so years would ever win a Presidency under a popular vote.
Like it or leave it, they're the party of older, less educated, richer, white rural America. Democrats are the party of anyone who is a part of or a champion of lower income inequality, higher multiculturalism, more tolerance and more diversity. That's why Republicans are more prone to fear mongering - they're a more homogenous "we" who can more easily be convinced that "we" as a group are being threatened by "them", and that's also why they want higher barriers of entry to voting and think that voter fraud is a much more serious and frightening issue than it is.
Some examples I have heard over and over....if you believe in tax cuts you favor the rich and dont care about the poor. If your faith does not support gay marriage you are a homophobe. If you support Trump you are racist or sexist. If you do not support open borders you are a racist. If you favor holding to the rule of law and not allowing illegal immigration you lack compassion. I could go on and on...and this does not come close to the nasty comments I have seen and read on Twitter toward Conservatives by self identified progressives.
You are correct that more blacks and Hispanics align with Dems and more whites with GOP, but suggesting only one side fear mongers and is intolerant is just plain wrong.
1. I don’t believe tax cuts for the rich, and trickle down economics , do the majority of this country any good, including the poor . I’m also not in favor of calling the poor free loaders, lazy , losers etc and I’m not in favor of slashing programs those people need to survive .Those sound like caricatures or immature social media nonsense to me. How many people do you actually know that actually believe any of those things? I know very, very few, and I probably know way more progressives and liberals than you! But, let's see - anyone else in this thread care to admit that they believe any of the following?
• If someone believes in tax cuts they don't care about the poor
• If someone's faith doesn't support gay marriage they are a homophobe
• If someone supports Trump or believes in securing our border they are inherently racist or sexist?
• If someone supports our laws and doesn't want illegal immigration they are lacking in compassion?
Let's see how many of the 'liberals' that dominate P&R actually believe any of these.
Oh and re: the bold, I never said or claimed that. So, not sure why you're referencing a non-existent statement.
• If someone believes in tax cuts they don't care about the poor
• If someone supports our laws and doesn't want illegal immigration they are lacking in compassion?
• If someone's faith doesn't support gay marriage they are a homophobe
• If someone supports Trump or believes in securing our border they are inherently racist or sexist?
Let's see how many of the 'liberals' that dominate P&R actually believe any of these.
1. I don’t believe tax cuts for the rich, and trickle down economics , do the majority of this country any good, including the poor . I’m also not in favor of calling the poor free loaders, lazy , losers etc and I’m not in favor of slashing programs those people need to survive .
2. Whatever your faith is should not determine who another person loves , and should not be used to deny them any human rights or the pursuit of happiness .
3. I don’t support illegal immigration but I also don’t support locking little kids up or separating them from their parents . There are better far less brutal ways to solve that problem .
None of that is the question.
The response makes sense if you think about it. He omitted the things that were in the claim because he doesn't believe in them and in that way answered the question.
I was trying to serve a point without derailing or completely shifting the topic of conversation. Any little thing will easily get picked up on and turned into THE hyper topic of the next several pages.
I mean hell, I'm still waiting on him to acknowledge all the evidence of Obama/Democrats condemning violence and speaking against hateful anti cop rhetoric.