BigRedBuster
Well-known member
Only about 45% down from the peak when it opened. I would still love to know who it was that thought it was a good investment back then.
I would never buy that stock. It’s likely to fall even farther, probably much farther. The question will be….does he gain more than his investment of what is reportedly $45 million when he is able to sell his stock?Only about 45% down from the peak when it opened. I would still love to know who it was that thought it was a good investment back then.
I have no idea how many shares he has. But, I expect it to be well below $10 per share in the not so distant future.I would never buy that stock. It’s likely to fall even farther, probably much farther. The question will be….does he gain more than his investment of what is reportedly $45 million when he is able to sell his stock?
He reportable owns 60% of themI have no idea how many shares he has. But, I expect it to be well below $10 per share in the not so distant future.
So, if it gets to $10, his share is still worth $820,200,000.He reportable owns 60% of them
So, it would have to get below .54 for him to lose money.He reportable owns 60% of them
America’s financial system is so f#&%ed up.So, if it gets to $10, his share is still worth $820,200,000.
Just wait. It’s going well below $10. But, my question is, why isn’t there already? However, it would have to get below .50 for him to lose money.America’s financial system is so f#&%ed up.
If your numbers are accurate, how on gods green earth does a person start a company, lose 90% of its initial value, and still walk away making 2000%?!?!
W in T actual F !!!!
I guess I have no idea but with so many investors buying different options maybe it just sort of bumps it up here and there and then it falls again. I really have no idea, I don't know anything about fake twitter. But I am sure there are investors out there that know how to make some quick money on it???Just wait. It’s going well below $10. But, my question is, why isn’t there already? However, it would have to get below .50 for him to lose money.
Just to correct the previous posters comment, at $10 the company wouldn’t have lost 90% of its initial value. An IPO isn’t a company’s initialJust wait. It’s going well below $10. But, my question is, why isn’t there already? However, it would have to get below .50 for him to lose money.
At one point, it was at 66.22. So, at $10, that's an 85% drop.Just to correct the previous posters comment, at $10 the company wouldn’t have lost 90% of its initial value. An IPO isn’t a company’s initial
value.
All that said, I still wouldn’t invest in the company
I understand that, but again, that is the top value not the initial value. The initial value of the company (not initial public offering) was probably close to what the initial investment was, maybe a bit more. The value of the company looked like it steadily increased over the few years since formationAt one point, it was at 66.22. So, at $10, that's an 85% drop.