No worries, thought it was Amazing almost perfect direct correlation between who is playing football and who isn’t. If it needs to be nixed, So be it.
My thought process is it seems like the leadership of the conference and the political leanings of the leagues geographic footprint seems to be a factor in who is playing and who is not playing. The map was kind of compelling.
The university presidents seem to be mirroring perfectly the political leanings of their respective states. One type of majority in a state consistently doesn’t want to play and the other side when in a majority in a state consistently wants to play. Interesting stuff.
Utah not surprisingly is the outlier in the pac
nebraska and Indians are the outliers in the Big10. With Iowa, Michigan, Iowa and Wisconsin on the fence.
southeast, big 12 and acc are all perfectly aligned across the board, with just Virginia and Boston college as an outlier
Agree 1,000 ^
Its amazing how many want to brush the map and this line of thinking under the carpet.