I guess we'll see how it plays out, but I think the B10 is poor this year, even if the rankings are good because we've played no one.
I'm not sure what the emoji means. You're usually really data driven, which I appreciate, so if you think my assessment of the B10, especially the B10W, is unfair, I'd appreciate hearing your thoughts on it.
Well, for starters my "data" would be the AP and Coaches' polls. They're imperfect but a pretty good indicator.
Next, I would look at Jeff Sagarin's ratings. There you find B1G teams at #2, 3, 10, 24, 31, 34, and 44. So half the conference is in the Top 45 including about a third of the Top 10.
It's somewhat top-heavy but saying it's "poor" is out of touch with reality.