"These aren't Bo Pelini's Cornhuskers, folks."

Count 'Bility said:
Speaking of Pelini, what did his kid tweet out that drew attn but was quickly deleted? I saw it across my timeline of some husker dude retweeting it with comment "apple dont fall far from the tree" then shortly after one of our beat guys asking folks to not bother the kid about it. Ive seen nothing more since.

That f'ing guys gonna haunt us for decades aint he?
Click to expand...
Basically "Shoutout to Wisconsin on the win. Shoutout to Nebraska for paying for a college education for my brothers and I."

 
ADS said:
cm husker said:
ADS said:
cm husker said:
Pelinis huskers would have likely crushed that delapidated wisky team. It's unfortunate that people want to keep bringing him up though.

I can understand badger fans loving our new system though.
Click to expand...
Need to try a little harder than that.
Click to expand...
How, by pulling a single random mention out of an article and making that the headline of a thread?
Click to expand...
Come on Patrick. You got your school paid for by Nebraska and you even mentioned it in a tweet last night. Give it up man.
Click to expand...
Huh?

 
Wiscy's defense was still good even with their leading tackler and a few other starters out on defense with injuries. Their offense was a different story. Horrible QB play even after shuffling QB's and it's funny that people are on Langsdorf for his play calling after seeing/watching Wiscy's especially after they went up 17-7. I think Nebraska is lucky the game was as close as it was.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
cm husker said:
Pelinis huskers would have likely crushed that delapidated wisky team. It's unfortunate that people want to keep bringing him up though.

I can understand badger fans loving our new system though.
Click to expand...
Pelini's Huskers never crushed Wisconsin, ever. Even the 7-5 Wisconsin team that they squeaked by earlier in the year absolutely murdered the Huskers in Indy. And this Wisconsin team is better than that one.

 
saunders45 said:
cm husker said:
Pelinis huskers would have likely crushed that delapidated wisky team. It's unfortunate that people want to keep bringing him up though.

I can understand badger fans loving our new system though.
Click to expand...
Pelini's Huskers never crushed Wisconsin, ever. Even the 7-5 Wisconsin team that they squeaked by earlier in the year absolutely murdered the Huskers in Indy. And this Wisconsin team is better than that one.
Click to expand...
I don't believe this Wisconsin team is better than that one. That Wisconsin team lost a ton of close games that year and was better on offense. We'll see how it plays out, but I could see Wisconsin dropping at least 2 more games this year.

 
Bowfin said:
The last time a Pelini Husker team faced a deflated Badger team, they lost 70-31. Would you like a link?
Click to expand...
So Riley has more "quality losses" than Pelini?
Click to expand...
Your response doesn't really make sense.

But yeah, sadly, Riley has two much higher quality losses over Wisconsin compared to Bo's 3 plunkers. If we are really pretending it's a competition on who lost better to Wisconsin.

 
Wisconsin would've racked up at least 300 yards rushing against Bo's defense. The wheels would've come off after Wisconsin went up 17-7.

 
cm husker said:
saunders45 said:
cm husker said:
Pelinis huskers would have likely crushed that delapidated wisky team. It's unfortunate that people want to keep bringing him up though.

I can understand badger fans loving our new system though.
Click to expand...
Pelini's Huskers never crushed Wisconsin, ever. Even the 7-5 Wisconsin team that they squeaked by earlier in the year absolutely murdered the Huskers in Indy. And this Wisconsin team is better than that one.
Click to expand...
I don't believe this Wisconsin team is better than that one. That Wisconsin team lost a ton of close games that year and was better on offense. We'll see how it plays out, but I could see Wisconsin dropping at least 2 more games this year.
Click to expand...
As of today, Sagarin, S&P+, and F+ all have this year's Wisconsin team rated higher (to much higher) than 2012.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My God. I've done my share of responding to this troll but at some point we all need to pretend he doesn't exist.

 
If we are really pretending it's a competition on who lost better to Wisconsin
Click to expand...
Don't put this back on me, I didn't mention any scores in comparing losses...that was that other guy saying something about 70-31.

I am pretty much binary when it comes to losses. It either is or it isn't one.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top