This Beaver feels your pain

These opinions are not made just based on one game why do you think that those of us they want him gone or just basing this on one game did entire season of bad decisions how can you not see that

 
So what exactly does Riley do during the game? He doesn't have a play sheet and he typically doesn't have his microphone piece on his headset down. He also doesn't seem to coach at all during huddles when there's a timeout. He just stands there and looks confused the entire game.

 
I did see him have a moment with the string on his hoody.
bc19.gif


 
So what exactly does Riley do during the game? He doesn't have a play sheet and he typically doesn't have his microphone piece on his headset down. He also doesn't seem to coach at all during huddles when there's a timeout. He just stands there and looks confused the entire game.
We were saying the exact same thing. Seriously man. Retire. You had your run as a coach in the game. Just get it over with. You are a nice guy and I'll wish you nothing but the best but seriously it's time to spend time with the grandchildren.

Time to end it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm in denial to think that Riley doesn't do nothing on gamedays as a HC?

Okay. Enjoy it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
zoogs said:
Why is it that Nebraska having to go with its 2nd string QB means 5 horrendous turnovers off of which Purdue scored 28 points? Why is it that missing your best offensive lineman, two solid receivers, the starting RB, the leading tackler (S) and the top CB mean Nebraska can't overcome said point-gifting mistakes?

I mean, who recruited these guys? Injuries are part of the game.

*In fairness, not even Michigan State would have prevailed with the way points were being given to Purdue left and right. Credit Fyfe and the Huskers for fighting back as hard as they could, but between not having enough and continuing to make more mistakes, it was a losing effort.
unfortunately they don't want to hear this. It doesn't fit the theme of fire everybody.
Wisconsin has about the same number of injuries and a new HC. Still, they are 7-2 after hanging almost 50 points on Rutgers today, limiting them to 10 points.
 
zoogs said:
Why is it that Nebraska having to go with its 2nd string QB means 5 horrendous turnovers off of which Purdue scored 28 points? Why is it that missing your best offensive lineman, two solid receivers, the starting RB, the leading tackler (S) and the top CB mean Nebraska can't overcome said point-gifting mistakes?

I mean, who recruited these guys? Injuries are part of the game.

*In fairness, not even Michigan State would have prevailed with the way points were being given to Purdue left and right. Credit Fyfe and the Huskers for fighting back as hard as they could, but between not having enough and continuing to make more mistakes, it was a losing effort.
You put your guys into the best position to succeed. Having a guy with 7 career passes come out and throw nearly 50 times and abandoning the run against the worst rush D in the conference is not doing that.

 
Back
Top