Scratchtown
All-Conference
Can we not answer questions we were asked?Is this a thread about Oregon?
Can we not answer questions we were asked?Is this a thread about Oregon?
Talent can be developed. But when you combine the two. Good recruiting and development. That's when you have a Bama, FSU and the like.How much talent does Houston have?
Per the recruiting rankings, not much at all.
Per the on the field product, apparently enough to beat a recruiting darling.
Ok, I can bring it back to the OP. Oregon doesn't look as good, because their talent is down. Talent on the O-line is down which is bringing Royce Freeman down. He was 11 carries for 87, but he had 1 carry for 49. So he was 10 for 38 on the other carries. I don't think Hefrich is nearly as talented of a coach as Chip Kelly.Is this a thread about Oregon?
Talent can be developed. But when you combine the two. Good recruiting and development. That's when you have a Bama, FSU and the like.How much talent does Houston have?
Per the recruiting rankings, not much at all.
Per the on the field product, apparently enough to beat a recruiting darling.
They also went out and hired a freaking boss-a$$-coachHow much talent does Houston have?
Per the recruiting rankings, not much at all.
Per the on the field product, apparently enough to beat a recruiting darling.
who will likely be in Baton Rouge or god knows where this time of year next year. Certainly wont be in Houston.They also went out and hired a freaking boss-a$$-coach...How much talent does Houston have?
Per the recruiting rankings, not much at all.
Per the on the field product, apparently enough to beat a recruiting darling.
I did not even think about LSU...man, you might be right. I think he is from Texas so LSU would not be all that far off and lets face it...they will toss him a contract worth about 5 million a year with an asst pool of probably 4-5 million to work with.who will likely be in Baton Rouge or god knows where this time of year next year. Certainly wont be in Houston.They also went out and hired a freaking boss-a$$-coach...How much talent does Houston have?
Per the recruiting rankings, not much at all.
Per the on the field product, apparently enough to beat a recruiting darling.
Miles is already dun. That loss saturday was the dagger. Unless he goes unbeaten from here. But with that offense it's not happening. Im not a Les Miles fan. Never have been. Nothing about his program suggests solid coaching. Just riding on the shirttails of incredible talent. And i think ppl of LSU have finally seen it the same way. What transpired at Lambeau Saturday was complete and utter garbage.I did not even think about LSU...man, you might be right. I think he is from Texas so LSU would not be all that far off and lets face it...they will toss him a contract worth about 5 million a year with an asst pool of probably 4-5 million to work with.who will likely be in Baton Rouge or god knows where this time of year next year. Certainly wont be in Houston.They also went out and hired a freaking boss-a$$-coach...How much talent does Houston have?
Per the recruiting rankings, not much at all.
Per the on the field product, apparently enough to beat a recruiting darling.
Herman has an "it" factor to him, like Meyer does...he is like a young Meyer...he just seems to make his guys believe they are going to win.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VLzJX8CRzM
I might be basing this on U.C. Davis upsetting Stanford on the road in 2005, which is already a long time ago.They arn't very good, they were 2-9 last year. The really good Oregon teams would have won this game 70-14. It was just the first game of the season, but Davis played within 2 TDs the whole game. Oregon has a lot of work to do on defense and the offense was a little shaky. Their return game looked great.fwiw....U.C. Davis has a history of looking better than they are against teams that overlook them.
Wasnt Standford like Kansas bad at that time too? I dont think they started making hay in their Harbaugh turn around until they beat USC in 2007 I believe.I might be basing this on U.C. Davis upsetting Stanford on the road in 2005, which is already a long time ago.They arn't very good, they were 2-9 last year. The really good Oregon teams would have won this game 70-14. It was just the first game of the season, but Davis played within 2 TDs the whole game. Oregon has a lot of work to do on defense and the offense was a little shaky. Their return game looked great.fwiw....U.C. Davis has a history of looking better than they are against teams that overlook them.
I agree but I view talent mostly as motion. So, on a level playing field, the team with more players that can run quicker, faster, jump higher, better hand coordination, duck, dive, twist and turn, stop and speed up, burst....is more talented. Skill is different and sometimes more skill is better than talent by itself.It would start with the measureables. Speed, strength and quickness. Add in a desire to succeed. Intelligence about the sport they play but also the ability to function in society. Granted boys especially at high school age don't always make the best decisions. Throw in the luck to have quality high school coaches or transferring to where there are good coaches that allow the athlete to practice without bad habits.
Are you talking faculty or kids?I'm a teacher, so basically talented to me is being able to tie your shoes. Everyone deserves a ribbon!
So can these things come about through strength and conditioning and practice?I agree but I view talent mostly as motion. So, on a level playing field, the team with more players that can run quicker, faster, jump higher, better hand coordination, duck, dive, twist and turn, stop and speed up, burst....is more talented.