deedsker
All-Conference
Sign me up on that one.This guy here has a good plan. I'm on board.We need to just beat the crap out of everyone on our schedule. Just do it.
Sign me up on that one.This guy here has a good plan. I'm on board.We need to just beat the crap out of everyone on our schedule. Just do it.
YES to the bold. Very much so. And I think that infects our team a bit, too."Never Letting Up" is somewhat different from not being intimidating in the first place. Possibly outside of Wyoming last year, I don't recall many situations where a clearly superior Nebraska had an opponent down but failed to put their foot on the neck. I think the mindset of Nebraska is definetely where the problem lies, but I don't see much debate that we've lacked enthusiasm on the sideline, much less a killer instinct. Worse, I think some teams look at Nebraska as a wounded warrior; easier to beat but it still means something because we're still Nebraska.Lo Country is the only one who is getting what I'm saying here. It has less to do with the other team and far more to do with the mindset of Nebraska. With the 85 scholarship limit everyone knows there's talent everywhere. Nobody is truly "scared" of anyone.
You earn it on the field. But then, you always earn it on the field. Every game. Every year.
I think what you were looking for is something that we've talked about here and elsewhere, many of the recent Nebraska teams think they're the Nebraska of lore because of a shared zip code and common uniforms. That's a problem and games like FAU need to continue.YES to the bold. Very much so. And I think that infects our team a bit, too."Never Letting Up" is somewhat different from not being intimidating in the first place. Possibly outside of Wyoming last year, I don't recall many situations where a clearly superior Nebraska had an opponent down but failed to put their foot on the neck. I think the mindset of Nebraska is definetely where the problem lies, but I don't see much debate that we've lacked enthusiasm on the sideline, much less a killer instinct. Worse, I think some teams look at Nebraska as a wounded warrior; easier to beat but it still means something because we're still Nebraska.Lo Country is the only one who is getting what I'm saying here. It has less to do with the other team and far more to do with the mindset of Nebraska. With the 85 scholarship limit everyone knows there's talent everywhere. Nobody is truly "scared" of anyone.
You earn it on the field. But then, you always earn it on the field. Every game. Every year.
I'm saying part of the reason we don't get teams down & step on their neck is that mentality. Frailty, lack of esprit de corps... whatever you want to call it. Maybe "letting up" wasn't the best phrase I ever came up with for a thread title, and I see I'm being held to that, when in reality if there's any "letting up," it's in the locker room before the game even starts. We seem to have athletes whose engines run on idle, when they have to have the RPMs racing from the opening kickoff.
Past players and former coaches alike have said this. NU needs to come out of the gate and play a complete 4 quarters of no mercy, a$$ kicking, play past the whistle, punch you in the throat football. Play like this and you will see opposing teams take notice. Will they be "scared"? That's a subjective word. Will a receiver be "short arming"balls across the middle? Possibly. QB and receivers "hearing footsteps"? Again possibly. RB's going down at first contact instead of trying to break tackles because the red horde is gunning for him in a huge gang tackle? Possibly.I think what you were looking for is something that we've talked about here and elsewhere, many of the recent Nebraska teams think they're the Nebraska of lore because of a shared zip code and common uniforms. That's a problem and games like FAU need to continue.YES to the bold. Very much so. And I think that infects our team a bit, too."Never Letting Up" is somewhat different from not being intimidating in the first place. Possibly outside of Wyoming last year, I don't recall many situations where a clearly superior Nebraska had an opponent down but failed to put their foot on the neck. I think the mindset of Nebraska is definetely where the problem lies, but I don't see much debate that we've lacked enthusiasm on the sideline, much less a killer instinct. Worse, I think some teams look at Nebraska as a wounded warrior; easier to beat but it still means something because we're still Nebraska.Lo Country is the only one who is getting what I'm saying here. It has less to do with the other team and far more to do with the mindset of Nebraska. With the 85 scholarship limit everyone knows there's talent everywhere. Nobody is truly "scared" of anyone.
You earn it on the field. But then, you always earn it on the field. Every game. Every year.
I'm saying part of the reason we don't get teams down & step on their neck is that mentality. Frailty, lack of esprit de corps... whatever you want to call it. Maybe "letting up" wasn't the best phrase I ever came up with for a thread title, and I see I'm being held to that, when in reality if there's any "letting up," it's in the locker room before the game even starts. We seem to have athletes whose engines run on idle, when they have to have the RPMs racing from the opening kickoff.
knapplc
You are losing this debate. And you don't know it, right?
At the end of the games I thought both UCLA and Minnesota were superior. It wasn't that we let down our guard, or lost a killer instinct we had earlier in the game. It's that the other teams made the proper adjustments early, we made virtually no adjustments to their adjustments, and both opponents won going away.UCLA last year, if you think we were superior."Never Letting Up" is somewhat different from not being intimidating in the first place. Possibly outside of Wyoming last year, I don't recall many situations where a clearly superior Nebraska had an opponent down but failed to put their foot on the neck. I think the mindset of Nebraska is definetely where the problem lies, but I don't see much debate that we've lacked enthusiasm on the sideline, much less a killer instinct. Worse, I think some teams look at Nebraska as a wounded warrior; easier to beat but it still means something because we're still Nebraska.Lo Country is the only one who is getting what I'm saying here. It has less to do with the other team and far more to do with the mindset of Nebraska. With the 85 scholarship limit everyone knows there's talent everywhere. Nobody is truly "scared" of anyone.
You earn it on the field. But then, you always earn it on the field. Every game. Every year.
Minnesota last year? Up 10-0.
Isn't there a video of the Minnesota OC talking about Nebraska's defensive tendencies and how he planned to exploit them BEFORE the game was even played?I'm not buying any of this. The reason why no one "respects" Nebraska is because of the culture of the player. Social media allows them to flap their gums at a more fervent pace than 20 years ago. And you even have head coaches making back handed comments about each other at press conferences and interviews.
It's just a different age and the level of sportsmanship we used to see and expect is gone. No team respects another team anymore. Period.
So you're saying, if the beatings continue, the morale will improve.Past players and former coaches alike have said this. NU needs to come out of the gate and play a complete 4 quarters of no mercy, a$$ kicking, play past the whistle, punch you in the throat football. Play like this and you will see opposing teams take notice. Will they be "scared"? That's a subjective word. Will a receiver be "short arming"balls across the middle? Possibly. QB and receivers "hearing footsteps"? Again possibly. RB's going down at first contact instead of trying to break tackles because the red horde is gunning for him in a huge gang tackle? Possibly.I think what you were looking for is something that we've talked about here and elsewhere, many of the recent Nebraska teams think they're the Nebraska of lore because of a shared zip code and common uniforms. That's a problem and games like FAU need to continue.YES to the bold. Very much so. And I think that infects our team a bit, too."Never Letting Up" is somewhat different from not being intimidating in the first place. Possibly outside of Wyoming last year, I don't recall many situations where a clearly superior Nebraska had an opponent down but failed to put their foot on the neck. I think the mindset of Nebraska is definetely where the problem lies, but I don't see much debate that we've lacked enthusiasm on the sideline, much less a killer instinct. Worse, I think some teams look at Nebraska as a wounded warrior; easier to beat but it still means something because we're still Nebraska.Lo Country is the only one who is getting what I'm saying here. It has less to do with the other team and far more to do with the mindset of Nebraska. With the 85 scholarship limit everyone knows there's talent everywhere. Nobody is truly "scared" of anyone.
You earn it on the field. But then, you always earn it on the field. Every game. Every year.
I'm saying part of the reason we don't get teams down & step on their neck is that mentality. Frailty, lack of esprit de corps... whatever you want to call it. Maybe "letting up" wasn't the best phrase I ever came up with for a thread title, and I see I'm being held to that, when in reality if there's any "letting up," it's in the locker room before the game even starts. We seem to have athletes whose engines run on idle, when they have to have the RPMs racing from the opening kickoff.
All of this comes from a ruthless, but throat mentality that IMO has been absent from this team for several years. I hope the beat downs continue.
That's how we roll at my place of business.So you're saying, if the beatings continue, the morale will improve.