Russell Wilson:
Fr - 150/275, 54.5%, 1955 yards, 7.1 ypa, 17 TDs, 1 INT, 133.9 rating
So - 224/378, 59.3%, 3027 yards, 8.0 ypa, 31 TDs, 11 INTs, 147.8 rating
Jr - 308/527, 58.4 %, 3563 yards, 6.8 ypa, 28 TDs, 14 INTs, 127.5 rating
Tanner Lee:
Fr - 185/336, 55.1%, 1962 yards, 5.8 ypa, 12 TDs, 14 INTs, 107.6 rating
So - 143/276, 51.8%, 1639 yards, 5.9 ypa, 11 TDs, 7 INTs, 109.8 rating
Tommy Armstrong
Fr - 68/131, 51.9%, 966 yards, 7.4 ypa, 9 TDs, 8 INTs, 124.3 rating
So - 184/345, 53.3%, 2695 yards, 7.8 ypa, 22 TDs, 12 INTs, 133.0 rating
Jr - 222/402, 55.2%, 3030 yards, 7.5 ypa, 22 TDs, 16 INTs, 128.6 rating
The part where you're still arguing that Lee is in any way comparable to Wilson is laughable. Wilson is noticeably better in percentage, yards, yards per attempt, TDs, INTs and rating. There are really no stats for you to make that claim off of so you're apparently just making it up.
Comparing TA's freshman year percentage and ypa to Wilson is fairly close but Wilson was significantly better in TDs, INTs and rating. Wilson was significantly better in everything other than yards per attempt their next two years.
So please let me know what stats you are using to say they rank right up there with Wilson.