tOSU Phantom Interception

The irony that everyone claiming ref bias from things that happened in the 1st quarter, but everyone seems to neglect all the things that happened in the last quarter that allowed Penn State to score 10 points.

 
Coqui said:
The irony that everyone claiming ref bias from things that happened in the 1st quarter, but everyone seems to neglect all the things that happened in the last quarter that allowed Penn State to score 10 points.
Click to expand...
Can you just admit it was not an interception please. And also admit your slimy heart attack faking coach is probably a transvestite.

We'll all feel better if you do.

 
Marf said:
Coqui said:
The irony that everyone claiming ref bias from things that happened in the 1st quarter, but everyone seems to neglect all the things that happened in the last quarter that allowed Penn State to score 10 points.
Click to expand...
Can you just admit it was not an interception please. And also admit your slimy heart attack faking coach is probably a transvestite.

We'll all feel better if you do.
Click to expand...
Yes. It wasn't an interception.

No, that, nor the missed delay of game penalty on the field goal didn't cost PSU the game.

The refs gifted back 10 points to PSU to even it out.

Regarding the transvestite part? What people do on their own time is none of my concern.

 
QMany said:
How was PSU gifted 10 points?
Click to expand...
Calling roughing the passer on Bosa when he was pushed and rolled into Hackenberg (7 points)

Passing interference on Apple when he was only making a play on the ball itself (3 points)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Coqui said:
The irony that everyone claiming ref bias from things that happened in the 1st quarter, but everyone seems to neglect all the things that happened in the last quarter that allowed Penn State to score 10 points.
Click to expand...
You are joking right?

This was so obviously wrong.. nothing in the 4th quarter was this obviously bad...

 
Coqui said:
QMany said:
How was PSU gifted 10 points?
Click to expand...
Calling roughing the passer on Bosa when he was pushed and rolled into Hackenberg (7 points)

Passing interference on Apple when he was only making a play on the ball itself (3 points)
Click to expand...
Rolled? Not so much. And saying he was pushed is ... well ... pushing it.

nla4JU.jpg


 
Mavric said:
Coqui said:
Pushed tripped, whatever, there was no intent on roughing the passer.
Click to expand...
Intent has nothing to do with it.
Click to expand...
Uh yeah it does.

Roughing the Passer
ARTICLE 9. a. No defensive player shall charge into a passer or throw him
to the ground when it is obvious the ball has been thrown. (Exception: A
defensive player who is blocked by a Team A player with a force so that he
has no opportunity to avoid contact with the passer. However, this does not
relieve the defensive player of responsibility for personal fouls as described in
elsewhere in this section.) (A.R. 2-30-4-I and II; A.R. 9-1-9-I; and A.R.10-2-
2-XIII).
b. When an offensive player is in a passing posture with one or both feet on the
ground, no defensive player rushing unabated shall hit him forcibly at the knee
area or below. The defensive player also may not initiate a roll or lunge and
forcibly hit this opponent in the knee area or below. [Exceptions. (1) It is not
a foul if the offensive player is a runner not in a passing posture, either inside
or outside the tackle box. (2) It is not a foul if the defender grabs or wraps this
opponent in an attempt to make a conventional tackle. (3) It is not a foul if the
defender is not rushing unabated or is blocked or fouled into this opponent.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's not intent. There is an exception for being blocked. The official didn't think he was and I agree

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top