So, two years ago, we had Morgan and needed that second. Morgan left and then we said we would be okay because we had Spielman [I think ... Lindsey was in there also]. What we saw was that we needed one more good receiver to step up. We got Wandale and he was gonna be the change as a good #2 and that would open up Spielman. Spielman left and then the board says we will be fine, we have Wandale ... we just need someone else to step . Now it's Wandale who will leave and we are back to "we will be fine" ... but we will actually have no proved WR ... let alone a QB who could throw to a #1 WR.
Here is my question ... what if Morgan stays another year [obviously, he couldn't], what if Spielman stayed another year, what if Wandale stays another year. See ... it's all these "move on's" that put us back to the "next man up" and we aren't deep enough to bear these types of things. So, I see Wandale moving on as the death of "the hope in Frost". Guys who came here thinking they were going to win a championship in the next few years see that "it" isn't happening under Frost.
I agree that Wandale is a "component piece" ... but if we could actually keep the WR's for the full term we would be so much better in production. What I do see is that Wandale sees a better future elsewhere where Frost/QB's are better or have a better use of him. I don't think Wandale is the type of player to move on from a program that was meeting his expectation. So, rather than believe that someone else will "step up" ... we really need to be asking why the "face of the franchise" is moving on.
I'm still a believer that it's the building of the DL group and the OL group that will create the best avenue to success ... but to lose a "piece" like Wandale for his Junior and Senior season is something we cannot afford. Heck this year is a free year, so I think we would have Wandale for three more years if he stayed. Why would we be okay to see this piece leave. Huskers ... we have a problem! That's what I see.