StuckinChicago
Starter
I dont have to prove your point Hunter. The rest of the NCAA does it for me. Relying entirely on one player because your quarterback in incapable of running the offense (Arkansas), or having no depth, no talent, and no hope (Kansas State) is not the kind of team I want to have. If you want to have them, go cheer for them. I would rather have a team that has talent, develops quarterbacks, and can run AND throw the ball EVERY YEAR (USC). As previously stated, USC has no problem recruiting quarterbacks, or retaining them, and NO ONE starts as a freshman. We have had one quarterback leave the team in four years and you freak out. I dont want to start freshman, I want to develop them and consistantly be in the top ten. The teams that are dont rely on bagging one phenom every four years to run the team. Thats the difference between the Ohio States/USCs/soon to be Nebraska, and fricken Arkansas.