The WF game was a brilliantly devious ploy by BC to get USC to overlook the Huskers.I was listening to rome the other day-- his comment was that if the NU we saw in the NU - WF game shows up, we lose by 4 TDs. Sadly, that doesn't seem unreasonable![]()
However, I think they're going to be crazy up for it![]()
That may be true.The WF game was a brilliantly devious ploy by BC to get USC to overlook the Huskers.I was listening to rome the other day-- his comment was that if the NU we saw in the NU - WF game shows up, we lose by 4 TDs. Sadly, that doesn't seem unreasonable![]()
However, I think they're going to be crazy up for it![]()
You know, USC's coaching staff are probably the only ones there taking us seriously. I really doubt the players are giving us much respect.
isn't that basicly what happend when USC played UCLA last year?That may be true.The WF game was a brilliantly devious ploy by BC to get USC to overlook the Huskers.I was listening to rome the other day-- his comment was that if the NU we saw in the NU - WF game shows up, we lose by 4 TDs. Sadly, that doesn't seem unreasonable![]()
However, I think they're going to be crazy up for it![]()
You know, USC's coaching staff are probably the only ones there taking us seriously. I really doubt the players are giving us much respect.
Re: Nebraska VS USC NO CONTEST« Reply #1 on Today at 10:43am »
1) Your web site "design" is an abomination. It's like Frontpage threw up in my web browser.
2) Since when do women think that their opinions on matters of football is anything other than related to "what kind of chips are you bringing me next?"
My favorite post from that site:
Re: Nebraska VS USC NO CONTEST« Reply #1 on Today at 10:43am »
1) Your web site "design" is an abomination. It's like Frontpage threw up in my web browser.
2) Since when do women think that their opinions on matters of football is anything other than related to "what kind of chips are you bringing me next?"