Trump Legal Troubles

Lil' Red said:
commando said:
Coach Power said:
Moiraine said:
Congress needs to act on this stuff and impeach him if any of it comes to fruition.
Click to expand...
Yea. Whats that going to do? It certainly isn't going to give Hilary the presidency.
I don't think the left should actually root for Trump being impeached. If it happens you'll be begging for him to come back.
Click to expand...
true....the tweeting trumpwit is not as ominous as the dark lord vp is.
Click to expand...
We already have a dark lord running the country with Bannon calling the shots. I think Pence would be an upgrade at this point.
Click to expand...
Frankly, considering Pence has gone along with Trump's shtick thus far, I realistically don't think we can count on him jettisoning Bannon, et al.

 
VectorVictor said:
Lil' Red said:
commando said:
Coach Power said:
Moiraine said:
Congress needs to act on this stuff and impeach him if any of it comes to fruition.
Click to expand...
Yea. Whats that going to do? It certainly isn't going to give Hilary the presidency.
I don't think the left should actually root for Trump being impeached. If it happens you'll be begging for him to come back.
Click to expand...
true....the tweeting trumpwit is not as ominous as the dark lord vp is.
Click to expand...
We already have a dark lord running the country with Bannon calling the shots. I think Pence would be an upgrade at this point.
Click to expand...
Frankly, considering Pence has gone along with Trump's shtick thus far, I realistically don't think we can count on him jettisoning Bannon, et al.
Click to expand...
Pence strikes me as a very craven dude. Just working his way up the ladder.

Now that he's seen that Bannon's game is working thus far, I'm not sure I'd count on him to stray from it, either.

 
Moiraine said:
Can you win a lawsuit by arguing that something is really really dumb?
Click to expand...
Yes and no, IMO.

Someone being dumb or ignorant, no, but the actions or results of the actions can be the catalyst for a suit. I am not an attorney and know enough to be dangerous but back in the NIxon days, our Supreme Court Justices made arguments revolving around the terms 'Qualified Immunity' and 'Absolute Immunity', when it came to the office of the president. Just bringing this out in case someone wants to read up on it and fill in the blanks.
default_smile.png


 
Sarcasm NM or? Most all laws or legal documents are written well. I guess I get that you are tying the two descriptions together but I try not to assume I know what someone else is trying to say in their post.

\_(º ~ º)_/

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kinda - he actually said that he "saw the EO and they were beautifully written, anybody would tell you so" (paraphrased a bit except the "beautifully written" part.

 
NM11046 said:
Kinda - he actually said that he "saw the EO and they were beautifully written, anybody would tell you so" (paraphrased a bit except the "beautifully written" part.
Click to expand...
OK, I get your reference. Thanks!

Honestly, hearing some of what is stated, I am not sure the words that come out are ever pre-planned. Could be wrong but?

 
I thought that was interesting too. Apparently the legal "tactic" is suing him for defamation instead of the actual sexual assault. In essence, they're alleging Trump defamed her by the way he described her and other accusers claims.

Interesting, but I"m certainly no legal mind so we'll have to see how that plays out.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top