The pass through tax cut being proposed is an attempt to give these people the most benefit. Notice I said X employees. If you own a business, employ no one else, and make whatever money, then the CEO (you), shareholders (you), and employees (you) all received the same benefits.
I guess you could add one line that says you own this many companies and got paid through them all and cap the limit before you loose benefits. Help eliminate shell companies and the millions they are trying to siphon off.
While most businesses are small, the majority of economic activity occurs in large businesses—including large pass-throughs. In 2014, almost 83 percent of all sales and 81 percent of profits accrued to businesses with more than $10 million in total receipts, even though those businesses only represented 1 percent of all firms (Figure 2, Figure 3).[5] Large businesses are responsible for nearly all of the sales and profits of C-Corporations, and a substantial majority of sales and profits of partnerships and S-corporations. Among sole proprietorships, in contrast, only 9 percent of sales and less than 1 percent of profits came from large businesses.
You're not going to believe this, but the Republicans aren't even giving the Democrats a list of the amendments to this Tax Bill. They think they have the votes to get it done so they're shutting the Democrats out entirely.
This is not how government should work. This is not Democracy.
I think the problem is more about going forward. I can't find the article right now, but what's happened when similar things have happened elsewhere, is that lots of businesses switch to being a type that allows pass through.I think it's important to understand what we are talking about. I think the term "pass through" is riling people up because it makes it sound like these entities are somehow some evil tax dodging for rich people.
In reality, yes, this can be the case. But, most are not.
LINK
So, while there are some large businesses that are sole Proprietorships or partnerships, the majority of entities are not large businesses.
So, I think we need to clarify what "pass throughs" we are talking about and not just make a blanket statement about them.
This.I think the problem is more about going forward. I can't find the article right now, but what's happened when similar things have happened elsewhere, is that lots of businesses switch to being a type that allows pass through.
Perhaps, but good politicians that cared about the government and the people of the US would have said, "No, but let's work together on something that might give that as an end result but would be easier to police and administer."BigRedBuster said:I would have to vote no also.
That is just something that sounds great in a sound bite, but in reality, it would be a nightmare to police and administer.
Just because something sounds good, doesn't mean it is feasible in real life.
This was nothing but a political move by the Dems and they knew it would never get put in the bill.
This.
You would be able to make yourself a contractor to your company, if you make enough, and get out of paying higher taxes. Highly simplified, but what would be expected/problem going forward.