Why not. We're right there with Alabama and Oregon.The saddest part of that graph is that I haven't considered Nebraska a legitimate Top 16 team during that span.
Not so fast.That is a truly mind numbing stat. How does an issue CLEARLY the biggest difference between 9 wins and 13 wins get neglected for that long????
I could name multiole games that could have been changed dramatically by 1 or 2 less turnovers. Bo would have won like 3 conference titles and he would still be here in a cool seat. Well saave for the embarassments.
Just shows that aggregate winning percentage isn't everything.Why not. We're right there with Alabama and Oregon.The saddest part of that graph is that I haven't considered Nebraska a legitimate Top 16 team during that span.
You could have us winning the turnover battle against OU and Mizzou in 08 and still losing by double digits, same for Tech '09, Wiscy and Michigan '11, Wiscy and tOSU '12, Wiscy '14.Not so fast.That is a truly mind numbing stat. How does an issue CLEARLY the biggest difference between 9 wins and 13 wins get neglected for that long????
I could name multiole games that could have been changed dramatically by 1 or 2 less turnovers. Bo would have won like 3 conference titles and he would still be here in a cool seat. Well saave for the embarassments.
How many of those embarrassments were in a fairly competitive state only to be thrusted into the fast track of out-of-hand with, well, turnovers.