I was just a C student, so bare with me. If college football is communicating an idea.... to incorporate an NFL rule, to help eliminate commercials during the earlier part of the game by adding a 2-minute warning rule?? That doesn't make sense to me. And it is not going to help the game and everybody knows it.
All it will do is provide more television commercials at the end of the game. The 2 minute warning is an automatic Television break.
By the way, I provided 6 different NFL rules that could benefit college football. Unfortunately, those rules would not benefit TV breaks, TV sponsors and TV advertisements.
All a 2-minute warning does is give viewers another commercial break, so they can grab nachos or call their grandma.
The game changing ideas I provided are basic NFL rules that would help the college football game, college players and their future. But those rules will not ultimately and financially help Ted the TV executive, Home Depot, Lilly at ATT, or T-Mobile and Verizon, State Farm or Liberty Biberty. Which is exactly why the idea of a 2-minute warning is being mentioned for college football.
No wonder the idea isn't being floated around for "2 feet in bounds" for a reception. Because there is no money involved in that. Further kicks placed back on extra point tries? No money. How about a spot foul on pass interference like the NFL does? No money. I hope people understand the underlining thinking by now. Changes typically comes down to money more often than not.