Tyjon Lindsey, hospitalized after a workout last month, is back to training at nearly full speed, Nebraska football coach Scott Frost said Thursday.
"Tyjon's doing well," the coach said of the fleet sophomore wide receiver from Corona, California. "He's pretty much back doing everything and looks pretty good, so I'm excited about where he is."
The case for 'exponentially': the increase is larger and larger the more threats there are on the field, rather than a constant scale factor. Three threats is better than two threats by more than two threats is better than one threat.
Oh! I missed it. By all means, let’s be nerds about it! Why is multiplicative more accurate? I do feel like the scale factor of the benefit is not constant. So the colloquial definition of exponentially is not in conflict with the mathematical one, and here’s a case where it isn’t misused. Am I misunderstanding one of these terms?
Exponential growth is not just when something grows quickly, or grows faster and faster. It's when the rate of growth is proportional to the current amount. For example, if you earn 5% on your investments in a year, then one million dollars of investments will earn $50,000 and ten thousand dollars of investments will earn $500. The growth is proportional to the amount already there, so this is exponential.
There are two criteria I can think of for a change to be "exponential":
1) The amount of change should be a constant percentage of the thing that's changing.
2) The independent variable should be continuous, or nearly so.