Look at Riley's actions; that tells you all you need to know about how he thinks a program should be run. There's no way he was going to come here and criticize the way things were done before, but how things are done now speaks volumes.
Similarly, a player who comes out dogging the previous coaches doesn't really 'get it', either. The ones that do, don't. We don't need to look too hard to see a few examples of friction simmering over last year, but we also don't need to dwell on it. Those cases appear to have been handled gently, and by year's end, re-channeled positively.
There's a weird desire in some corners to hang on to a "things aren't so different" narrative. When a parent comes out and rips Bo's style of handling his assistants, it's ignored. When a player comes out and says the right things, it's trumpeted as evidence that Bo's culture wasn't all that, or whatever. It's weird that, lost in MRI's completely forward-looking original message for 2016, is a big article and discussion about whether Bo - fired in 2014 - really was such a problematic influence here. You want toxic? Doesn't get much more clear-cut than that.
On to 2016, guys.