HSKR,
Your right. However look at the US population compared to the other European nations? We can't find 30 decent players? Is Klinsman the answer at coach? I don't know.
The US could have a population of 10 billion and it wouldn't matter if all the kids growing up want to be Kobe, Tom Brady or A-Rod. Sure we have some high school soccer now and some college soccer but do you honestly think kids take it seriously that if they sacrifice everything they might get a $100K contract in the MLS? Or would they be better off getting drafted in the NFL or NBA for millions?
I know a lot of people hate Klinsmann as coach but tonight was all about being beat by better talent. Belgium only has a population of 11 million but 99% of the kids there dream of being a soccer player. Now imagine if Ohio with a similar population to that of Belgium and every top athlete's first interest from Ohio was soccer but the reality is it isn't.
If you really want it explained just look at England and their level of organization of soccer. Cities like New York would have at least a dozen professional teams. Omaha would probably have two themselves and Lincoln a team or two, professional that is. Grand Island would have one, Wahoo would even have a team. Now spread that across the whole state and country and get rid of college football, college basketball, the NFL, MLB, NBA and the NHL and then we may be on a level playing field to recruit the kids. That's how serious they take it and we don't.
For the US it may actually be easier to keep introducing our other sports over there to thin the talent pool out then to try to get our kids here moved over to soccer. Basketball seems to be doing that in Europe for example.
I guess to sum it up, soccer in the US when compared to most of the world is A ball compared to MLB. That's how far we still have to go. Can you find me a roster from A ball that will win the World Series?