I think UNC goes no questions asked if they get the chance.I don't think UNC goes without Duke.
I think UNC goes no questions asked if they get the chance.I don't think UNC goes without Duke.
I'd add Colorado
I would say that about pretty much everyone left in the Big 12. At this point their biggest brand for football is what, Oklahoma State? Cincinnati? I mean they're good teams, but not exactly valuable brands in the CFB world, right? And at this point, it's the brands that matter most, even more than geographical markets. (Being in a big cable TV market isn't as important in the streaming era. Maryland and Rutgers are lucky they got in when they did.)
You are right. UNC doesn't care two craps about Duke. If anything, they would love to hop to a big conference without that pretentious, private school 8 miles away.I think UNC goes no questions asked if they get the chance.
I'd add Colorado
No. Not possible. That’s essentially what we have now. Too many schools. Not enough TVs and fans to support them. All the NCAA controls and limits of the past were designed to level the playing field and help the have nots to compete with the haves. Now, $$ is the overriding factor and the market says there’s not enough room for 140 teams in the college football market. The networks want the money games that sell. They can’t pay for games nobody wants to watch.Didn't read the whole thread, but is it possible that the Oregon States, Wazzous, and Iowa State of the world could be a tier 2 B1G team and the league goes the route of soccer's promotion/delegation model? Probably not, but examples in the past would be early 80's Miami, late 70's FSU, 00's Boise State. In typical HuskerBoard fashion, proceed with stoning the new user.
Would love that...the thing with what is all going on now...we will finally have warm weather schools having to play in snowDon’t be surprised if Miami starts getting brought up to go along with ND on joining the B1G.
From a strictly personal standpoint it wouldn't bother me a bit if they added CU, KSU, KU & ISU and made them our core games so we could play them every year. I know it makes now sense in this only thing that matters is money world we live in but I grew up with the Big 8 and having those derivable games every year against old foes would be fun.
Didn't read the whole thread, but is it possible that the Oregon States, Wazzous, and Iowa State of the world could be a tier 2 B1G team and the league goes the route of soccer's promotion/delegation model? Probably not, but examples in the past would be early 80's Miami, late 70's FSU, 00's Boise State. In typical HuskerBoard fashion, proceed with stoning the new user.
What about 3-8-8 with the protected rivals and 1 non-conference game? With these teams, you won't need many non-conference games. Play one challenge weekend with the other super conference or pick one old traditional rival...Iowa vs Iowa St or ND vs Navy or NU vs CU.I think divisions are out. Probably out everywhere.
The three protected games seems to be the rage right now. But I'm not sure they work with that many teams. The idea is to protect the most important rivalries but still get to play everyone else every-other year. I guess you could still do 4-5-5-5 with four protected games then play the other 15 teams every three years. But that's basically a pods system.
I actually think the pods you posted look pretty good. But I've been a fan of pods for awhile.
What about 3-8-8 with the protected rivals and 1 non-conference game? With these teams, you won't need many non-conference games. Play one challenge weekend with the other super conference or pick one old traditional rival...Iowa vs Iowa St or ND vs Navy or NU vs CU.