From rojo on another site:
Why we will beat Iowa State.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In general... to win one must be better in two of the three areas: offense, defense, special teams.
We are.
I. Offense. Everyone’s offense will be better than ours from here on….
That's quite possible.
--The Pitt game underlined what we had already seen. We have no gamebreakers. There is no one to fear. At best we have an average O-line, with average receivers, an average Quarterback, and the way we are defended… an average running attack.
--The pattern is in place. Play our receivers man-to-man, bump them hard at the line-of-scrimmage, pinch the defense in to slow our running game. Blitz when you want---it works.
.
II. Defense: One of the best in the Big 12.
--Give Callahan & Coz credit. They brought in the outside consultants in the winter. They changed the base alignment. They changed Elmo’s and Bush’s duties. And the young Blackshirts bought it all. They’re proud and playing with a comraderie that’s fun to see.
--After Spring ball Callahan said our D-line would be one of the best in the Big 12. There’s depth and constant rotation. The Linebackers are young, but fast---every one has an interception. The secondary has some questions, but with the strong play in front of them, they haven’t yet been exposed.
.
III. Special Teams: Solid.
--Credit to Callahan & Bush. Last year’s problems were addressed by moving Special Teams practice-time to the middle of practice. More time and emphasis.
.
IV. Iowa State and us: Comparable opponents through the first three games.
According to the latest Sagarin ratings…
--Iowa State has beat #49 Iowa, #91 Illinois State, & #142 Army.
--Nebraska has beat #71 Pitt, #92 Wake Forest, #168 Maine.
More-or-less comparable opponents---giving meaning to the following stats.
.
V. Compare Defense Rankings:
--Total Defense: NU #6, ISU #40 (232 yds/game allowed vrs. 341 )
--Scoring Defense: NU #1, ISU #23 (5 points/game allowed vrs. 15)
--Rush Defense: NU #10, ISU #63 (79 yds/game allowed vrs. 131)
--Pass Efficiency Defense: NU #2, ISU #11
--Tackles-for-Loss: NU #1, ISU #40 (14/game vrs. 7/game)
--Third-Down Conversion Defense: NU #4, ISU #32 (22% vrs 31%)
.
VI. Compare Special Teams Rankings:
--Net Punting: NU #4, ISU #39 (41 yards net vrs. 36)
--Punt Returns: NU #17, ISU #50 (15 yards vrs. 10)
--Kick-Off Returns: ISU #12, NU #14 (30 yards vrs. 28)
--Field Goals: NU 71% vrs. ISU 50% (5/7 vrs. 2/4)
.
VII. Compare Offense Rankings:
--Total Offense: ISU #91, NU #107 (319 yards/game vrs. 271)
--Scoring Offense: ISU #58, NU #87 (28 pts/game vrs. 21)
--Rushing Offense: NU #62, ISU #88 (138 yards vrs. 111)
--Pass Efficiency: ISU #49, NU #115 (132 vrs. 78)
.
VIII. The Bottom Line: We’re favored. And we should be.
--Last year Barney Cotton knew the strengths and weaknesses of our players as well as we did. It was in Ames, and we were a somewhat shaken team at that point. This year: No.
--Comparing stats has its limits. But when the message is consistent, one should listen. We’re favored, and we should be.
Just some things to think about....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by rojo : Today at 07:27 AM.