We are

[REDSTEEL]

4-1 is alot better than 1-4 no matter how you look at it

Waking up with four coyote uglies and missing out on the one hottie is better then nailing the one hottie and being turned down by the four hairlipped 300 pound girls?

See it's not always better but, Ill agree on the Win loss thing. chuckleshuffle

 

[Husker B]

4-1 is alot better than 1-4 no matter how you look at it

Waking up with four coyote uglies and missing out on the one hottie is better then nailing the one hottie and being turned down by the four hairlipped 300 pound girls?

See it's not always better but, Ill agree on the Win loss thing. chuckleshuffle

This makes no sense whatsoever. I see what you were trying to do, but it doesn't relate at all. Good try.

 

[Axl_sued_me]

We are.................

Mediocre

 

[Husker B]

We are.................

Mediocre

Last time I checked, a winning percentage of .800 is a bit above mediocre, but whatever you think.

 

[Redman]

We are.................

Mediocre

 

[REDSTEEL]

B)-->

QUOTE(Husker B @ Sep 29 2007, 06:32 PM) 227288[/snapback]

We are.................

Mediocre

Last time I checked, a winning percentage of .800 is a bit above mediocre, but whatever you think.




Thats what Solich thought to look where it got him.

 

[Husker B]

B)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Husker B @ Sep 29 2007, 06:32 PM) 227288[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->

We are.................

Mediocre

Last time I checked, a winning percentage of .800 is a bit above mediocre, but whatever you think.

Thats what Solich thought to look where it got him.

Yeah, and that is totally relevant to today.

Solich's teams weren't mediocre either.

 

[Bugeater]

B)-->

QUOTE(Husker B @ Sep 29 2007, 06:32 PM) 227288[/snapback]

We are.................

Mediocre

Last time I checked, a winning percentage of .800 is a bit above mediocre, but whatever you think.


Yeah, like that % is going to continue. Two of those wins are against non-bcs conference teams and another against the worst team in our division. Have you looked at our remaining schedule?

 

[HSKRNOKC]

lol @ this thread

LOL @ this sorry azz comment I'm quoting.

This is a good topic showing support. Threadkillers can move along.

It's just an opinion Adolph.

You have called a couple of folks Adolph. Are you refering to Hitler?

If so this is name calling and a board rule violation.

I would prefer you refrain from using that again please.

 

[Bugeater]

lol @ this thread

LOL @ this sorry azz comment I'm quoting.

This is a good topic showing support. Threadkillers can move along.

It's just an opinion Adolph.

You have called a couple of folks Adolph. Are you refering to Hitler?

If so this is name calling and a board rule violation.

I would prefer you refrain from using that again please.

Very well, but I felt he was encouraging censorship, something that this board doesn't do.

 

[HSKRNOKC]

lol @ this thread

LOL @ this sorry azz comment I'm quoting.

This is a good topic showing support. Threadkillers can move along.

It's just an opinion Adolph.

You have called a couple of folks Adolph. Are you refering to Hitler?

If so this is name calling and a board rule violation.

I would prefer you refrain from using that again please.

Very well, but I felt he was encouraging censorship, something that this board doesn't do.

Just expressing his opinion. That is encouraged. Name calling is not.

 

[TarheelTrojan]

4-1 with the only loss to the #1 team

I will take it anyday.

Congrats Huskers! A win is a win is a win however unglamorous the details are.

 

[HSKRNOKC]

lol @ this thread

LOL @ this sorry azz comment I'm quoting.

This is a good topic showing support. Threadkillers can move along.

It's just an opinion Adolph.

You have called a couple of folks Adolph. Are you refering to Hitler?

If so this is name calling and a board rule violation.

I would prefer you refrain from using that again please.

Very well, but I felt he was encouraging censorship, something that this board doesn't do.

Just expressing his opinion. That is encouraged. Name calling is not.

Back to topic please

 

[Bugeater]

lol @ this thread

LOL @ this sorry azz comment I'm quoting.

This is a good topic showing support. Threadkillers can move along.

It's just an opinion Adolph.

You have called a couple of folks Adolph. Are you refering to Hitler?

If so this is name calling and a board rule violation.

I would prefer you refrain from using that again please.

Very well, but I felt he was encouraging censorship, something that this board doesn't do.

Just expressing his opinion. That is encouraged. Name calling is not.

He didn't think my opinion belonged in this thread which is essentially a personal attack on me. So am I to understand that personal attacks are fine as long as no name-calling is involved?

 

[HSKRNOKC]

Im not naive. i realise that we have a ways to go but 4-1 isnt shabby.