Danny Bateman
Donor
Also, White Evangelicals are an interesting people unto themselves in politics. Not sure anything much needs to be said about this.
Apparently white evangelicals are becoming more tolerant.Also, White Evangelicals are an interesting people unto themselves in politics. Not sure anything much needs to be said about this.
That's great! So muslims, black people, homosexuals, women - all loved and respected by the white evangelicals now?Apparently white evangelicals are becoming more tolerant.
That's great! So muslims, black people, homosexuals, women - all loved and respected by the white evangelicals now?
Leading the other camp was Shane Claiborne, the self-described “radical evangelical,” author, and activist, who lives in a faith-based intentional community in Philadelphia.
The “Red Letter Revival” he co-organized — a direct repudiation of Falwell’s values — exhorted the people in attendance to divorce evangelicalism from politicized Christian nationalism and white supremacy.
Featuring a Native American prayer for the land, a Christian rapper who presented a prayer in poetry, and an openly bisexual speaker, the Red Letter Revival was diverse (only two of 18 presenters were white men) and passionately political.
Its speakers repudiated what Pastor David Anderson called “evangelicals ... more committed to the amendments than to the commandments.”
One Charlottesville pastor, Brenda Brown-Grooms, spoke up to declare “Christian nationalism” a form of “apostasy”: a serious and willful deviation from the Christian faith.
Their goal of the event? As Claiborne put it in an interview with Vox: “a Christianity that looks like Jesus again.” The racialized rhetoric of Trumpism, he said, meant that “the words of Jesus are getting lost in white evangelicalism.
A number of prominent evangelical writers, including Katelyn Beaty and Skye Jethani, have written about disavowing the term “evangelical.” Even Russell Moore has suggested going by the term “gospel Christian.” For these thinkers, the evangelical community has become synonymous with support for Trump and the white nationalist policies they see him represent.
So too the growing exodus of black evangelicals from the evangelical movement, many of whom report feeling pressured to vote for or support Donald Trump in spite of his statements on race.
As Doug Birdsall, chair of the international Lausanne organization of evangelicals, put it to the Washington Post: “When you Google ‘evangelicals,’ you get Trump.”
The Red Letter Christian movement — named for the red lettering used to denote Jesus’s words in many Bibles — is, in many ways, a direct repudiation of Falwell’s brand of Christianity.
For these thinkers, the evangelical establishment’s embrace of Trumpism — unbridled capitalism, xenophobic nativism, and a willingness to engage with white supremacy — goes against everything Jesus stands for.
“Jerry Falwell [Jr.]’s dream is a nightmare to our most marginalized people, those whom Jesus called the ‘least of these,’” Claiborne told Vox in a telephone interview.
The Red Letter Christians aren’t alone among evangelicals uncomfortable with the way GOP politics and Christianity have become intertwined. There are signs that in the wider community, dissenting voices, particularly over Trump’s seeming embrace of white supremacists, are growing. In July 2017, for example the Southern Baptist Convention near-unanimously passed a resolution condemning the “alt-right.” And last December, Roy Moore, an open proponent of Christian theocracy, lost a special election for US Senate in Alabama.
TheSker said:Apparently white evangelicals are becoming more tolerant.
"White Evangelical" is too large of a group for blanket statements.If by "more tolerant", you mean "overtly racist and hypocritical", then you're dead on. :thumbs
"White Evangelical" is too large of a group for blanket statements.
What in the world is wrong with these people?
The issue is that, for some reason, the Republican party has that vote locked up. It's one area they have done very well in.
I think Trump's favorable view within that broad population has much more to do with economic ideology than religious ideology.The Republican party has done a masterful job with this, honestly. They hijacked and pounced on the tribal nature of white Christianity in America, reinforced the myths of it (We understand a sacred truth that 'everyone else' doesn't // The world hates us because the world hates God // God helps those who help themselves aka pulling yourself up by the bootstraps, etc.), and presented itself as the saving force of that ideology while also providing a deflecting answer that blames 'the world' for every question they could have.
And that unfortunately, both parties are so polarized on the issue of abortion. Hold you nose and vote for Trump because the other side is not pro-life. I keep saying, if the Dems were smart - they'd recruit prolife Dems to run and I'd think they would win congress in a landslide. To Landlord's point - the Rupublicans have land locked the prolife vote into their party with a mote around it that to vote Dem would be the same as denying your faith.I think Trump's favorable view within that broad population has much more to do with economic ideology than religious ideology.
I've come to believe that the greatest thing to happen to the Republican party over the last 50 years was the Moral Majority.
I've also come to believe that the worse thing to happen to the church of Christ in the USA is the Moral Majority.
This is probably a losing strategy as they'd lose more pro-choice voters than they'd gain pro-life voters. Especially since 68% of their own party are pro-choice and independents are evenly split at 50%.I keep saying, if the Dems were smart - they'd recruit prolife Dems to run and I'd think they would win congress in a landslide.