Winning 5. We found creative ways to lose last year, mostly self inflicted.Here's a better question.
Let's say this team is exactly as good/bad as last year's.
How unlikely were the two records we posted? Was winning 5 games abnormal or was winning 9 games abnormal?
Phrasing it as the "only difference" is probably not correct on my part. Yes, winning those games this year is better than losing them last year. But if we don't crap down our legs last year in those 3 games we finish 9-4, which is exactly where we finished this year.I don't intend to come off as adversarial here, but are you stating this as fact or with the intent to suggest these wins were inconsequential improvements? Putting those three games in the win column was fairly substantial this year, imo.Wins vs Northwestern, Illinois, and Purdue are the only difference between last year and this year.
Maybe. From Sam's article on Monday:The defense was better
This was a big positive this year. Hopefully it is trend and not a 1 year mirage.The turnovers, and lack of turnovers, was better
The media and such made everything just seem worse because of the bolded. If the media and the polls wouldn't have had such a huge stiffy for the B1G this year, we probably don't crack the top 10. It's a harsh reality, but the B1G just didn't live up to their hype. This season felt very similar to other seasons we've had the past four decades.Interesting question.
I say probably not. I think the ball just bounced our way a few more times this year. Now is that an indication that Riley and Co are a total failure? To me, not yet. Did anyone really think NU was going to make any kind of a run last year or this year? Yeah 7-0 and being ranked top ten for a while was nice, but we had to all have known that that was going to be short lived. Last year was basically damage control. This year was establishing a culture/mindset/whatever you wanna call it. And next year will be, in my humble opinion, Riley's true first year.