Bo said once when this whole 2gap thing came under fire once last year that it wasnt two gap. That we "play heavy in our gap contro". Whatever that means. All in know is in high school, we played 2 gap-it's what it was. it's what we called it. it's what we did-with our DT's as well. And it looks exactly the same as what Nebraka does.
Now, the 2 gap has a place situationally like a lot of things do. But as an overall identity, and something that we just NEVER GO AWAY FROM, it's susceptible. It allows the offense to dictate and puts our personel into a far more reaction mode, instead of instinctive. Against teams with the run strengths of Wiscy, Minny, and Iowa you have to have the ability at times to penetrate, disrupt time and paths and wreak havoc. What upsets me about that, is that in guys liek Collins, Valentine, and Gregory we have the talent do such. Now, on the backside, sure, that aggressive play can leave you susceptible to things like screens and traps and the such, but hows about we stop what theyre doing NOW before we worry about what they could do later, first? That's the whole problem with this staff. And actually, it goes for both sides of the ball.
