quote name='HuskerGBR' date='Nov 8 2009, 11:44 AM' post='513364']
Maybe we don't need a new OC...if only Watson would evolve and adapt to a different offense that works with the type of players we can easily recruit then I think he would be just fine. I still believe and always have that we need to have a power running game as our offensive identity. We won't beat out other schools for the top WR's or QB's. But I still think we can get the big run blocking lineman, good RB's/FB's, and good TE's. I am not saying this has to happen this year or the next, because I think we need to just try to win however we can with the guys we have now. Our guys right now are not really made for the all out power game, but that is the direction I think we need to go to...the run game lets you wear down the defense, gives us an identity, should be easier for us to recruit for and teach to the guys, and in the end it should imbed a physical nature to our guys.
So maybe we don't need to get rid of Watson, but he does have a lot of learning he needs to do. Unless he can show he can evolve with his offense, then I would say it is time for him to go...plus I feel Bo needs to say at some point what he wants to do with the offense and then say that to Watson and let him try to accomplish that. Just what I think though.
barney is straight up a barney (sorry for surf lingo)... i remember reading people say he should be the next OC if Watson left... HELLLLL NOO
the guy is a tool... thought a tool who could kick my a$$...... i respect him but i think hes too much of an old dog.....
as for watson the dude had us ranked 12th nationaly in total offense last year... he knows what he is doing to an extent... but what i've gathered from my own questions and others maybe isnt the most flexible with what he has to work with...c ant always fit a triangle into a square peg.... but the guy isn't going no where... neither is C. Pelini... which i think is a good thing... stable staff is priceless in college football