This sums up the major difference to me between the success of the O vs the D. The physicality and "dog" mentality shown by the D. They were laying dudes out. Hard hitting, gang tackling, punishing etc....The O, not so much. They lacked the physicality in the blocking department across the board. From OL, to FB, to TE and WR's... really see the receivers fight for the ball or really "get after it". Hard I know, when the passing game was erratic, but none of our guys went after the ball like I have seen other teams. The "eye ball" test comes to mind. RB's did well, but would love to see them become sledge hammers that by quarter 4, the D doesn't want to hit. Unsure how the D developed that (coaches?) and the O did not (coaches?). Younger guys on O, QB play etc all factored in. Here's to next year. (After we beat Iowa and get a bowl!)