DaveH
Team HuskerBoard
I still think this "they don't come to northern schools because it is cold" idea is mainly hogwash. Sure, every recruit comments on how it is colder in northern schools, because, well, it is. But for that to be a deciding factor in where a college fooball team should recruit from is ludicrous in my opinion. If a kid wants to sit in the sun and have fun at the beach during college, that's great. Go to a west coast school. If they are actually interested in pursuing their academic and athletic careers they are going to look mainly at what the school has to offer, not what the average temperature is. I have never read "Well, I would have gone to Notre Dame but it was too cold. That's what it came down to." That sounds more like one of those Budweiser Leon commercials.ESPN made a very good point last week in stating that teams in colder climates are having extreme difficulties in getting the best players because these players want to play in fun cities where the weather is usually warm. Ok, so they were talking about Notre Dame. However, I believe it is just a shift in culture. The better players are staying down south or on the West Coast to play. This is why we need a coach that can develop talent from lesser athletes instead of a coach who "needs" the best athletes. One of the reasons we got a player into NU like a Tommie Frazier was simply because he wasn't heavily recruited as a QB at most schools because they didn't run the option. I really believe getting away from an offense that most teams don't run is a mistake because you can get the best players that run that offense. If NU has to go out and recruit against the Florida schools, Texas, OU, California teams, etc. each and every year; we aren't going to lure a lot of the best athletes away from them.
BTW speaking of, did you catch ESPN's Chris Mortensen's commentary on the almighty Raiders? He said that the Norv Turner is having the same problem that Gruden and Callahan had while at Oakland. They try to lay down the law with players, set fines, etc and they simply aren't enforced. Who is reponsible for that? None other than the worst owner in the history of the NFL, Al Davis. Just something I thought I would throw out there.
I am sick of these comparisons to schools like Texas. So every team that goes after the "best" athletes is automatically going to be a Texas? For every Texas there are at least 3 Auburn's, Virginia's, or OSU's that recruit well almost every year and have success. I will talk about comparing Texas to NU and Callahan to Brown in, say 5 years.I'm afraid this recruiting class coming in could be a ticking time bomb just like Texas had a couple of years ago. If BC is making playing promises to these guys like Mack Brown did Sims, then we are sitting on a time bomb. IMO, Mack Brown cost Texas a NC by playing Sims instead of Applewhite. However, he had made a promise to Sims and his dad and stuck to it. If BC is promising Beck and Lucky instant stardom next year, then we could be in for a long season once again.
The recruits with more talent, the Lucky's and Beck's, will be given their opportunity to play just like everyone else. Others could very well be redshirted. If they make an impact their first year, which I doubt, great. Next year I look for a better season, but not a whole lot. Maybe 3 losses.
The major assumtion you are making here is that high profile athletes are automatically shady, dumb or self centered. You and I know that isn't true. Also it isn't true that when you go after high profile athletes you have to cheat and break rules. Any kid can come in and be the next Incognito.With high profile athletes coming to your school, there is always a price. Just ask Ohio State about how much Claurett is costing them. We all know Blake can recruit, but we also know how much he gets out of these recruits by looking at his record at OU.