If we are going to do this hypothetical poll, you gotta break down both teams by positions. Id say the 2009 team is better. Who on the o-line this year could block both Crick and Suh? They would get manhandled by our 2009 D-line. And Martinez would crap his pants if Suh was coming after him. 2009 Lee , I think would have more poise in the pocket if the 2010 D-line was coming after him. And our 2009 O-line could hold their own against 2010 D-line. But at the same time, our 2010 D-backs were a little better than 2009, so Lee would have a tough time finding receivers. Even if he did, could they catch the ball? I saw no improvement from our receivers from 2009-10. And of course 2010 Rex was lights years above 2009 Rex, so that would help the 2010 team. Roy made minimal improvement from 2009-2010, so that's even. Now to Linebackers, David vs. Dillard? David is a GREAT player, but I think Id take Dillards leadership and smarts. He had that defense in position every snap.
So if I had to make a prediction, Id say 2009 NU offense can move the ball better against the 2010 defense and get into field goal range at least a few times. 2010 offense would crap their pants against the 2009 defense. That defense was scary good. No weaknesses at all. 2010 defense was weak at stopping the run. Id say 2009 NU: 6 2010 NU: 0. I don't think the 2010 offense would score a point on that defense and that is the honest truth.