If anyone happens to know which type scores the most touchdowns, that would be the one i would vote for.
Impossible. It’s a false dichotomy.
If anyone happens to know which type scores the most touchdowns, that would be the one i would vote for.
Are you using that phrase in the correct context?Impossible. It’s a false dichotomy.
One could argue part of that temper is what made him so great.....on the field.I prefer Lawrence Phillips without the violent temper.
And anyone making that argument would be wrong. Did he run/play in a violent manner, sometimes-sure, but if you’ve read much about him from his coaches and teammates you’d know his success on the field really had nothing to do with his temper and demons off of it. Every account I’ve ever seen (and they’re many) claims he was a great teammate and actually a stable, calming force in practice, on the sidelines and in games. You don’t receive those glowing reviews based on being controlled by a temper.One could argue part of that temper is what made him so great.....on the field.
I didn't find the actual statistic (most rushing TDs per attempt) by historical records for NU so I just looked over the career thousand yard rushers and would suggest the llist is weighted pretty heavily toward the powerful vs the speedy quick little ones. Note: we have had many RBs that possess both speed and power so they certainly qualify under the power category as it is ideal to have both. But arguably Nebraska coaches have elected to put the fastest POWERFUL runners out there over the speedy not so powerful ones. We've had dam few RBs who were not atleast 4.6 or faster so we really have few slow bruisers to consider in my view.Impossible. It’s a false dichotomy.
I believe you described Bo Jackson.Going back thru the RB’s of my time here is how I would classify the best RB’s I have seen play since the early 80s.
Rozier: great combo of size and speed
Keith Jones: pure speed back with sprinter’s speed
Ken Clark: power back with good speed
Derek Brown: speed and agility with decent power, versatile back
Calvin Jones: good combo of size and speed
LP: best combo of size and speed. Most talented NU I-back ever
Ahman: speed back who had power when needed. Probably the 3rd best I-back ever at NU
Helu: speed back who could break the long runs
Burkhead: power back who could get tough yards between tackles by making himself small and finding the creases
Ameer: good, but not great speed. Great power for his size, very quick and elusive with the ability to get to top speed after 1 cut. 4th best I-back in my lifetime at NU.
One of my favorite athletes of all time. I was all-in on the Bo Knows movement as a kid.I believe you described Bo Jackson.
While Craig had decent speed, I guess I can’t classify him as a burner. Those who remember the 1981 game where Nebraska beat Missouri 6 to 0, Craig broke into the clear of what appeared to be a sure TD. But there was a DB who was at least 10 yards behind him and who caught up to him and brought him down without any angle. With that said, Craig was a great back.I would say the only reason Craig (arguably the best pro career of any Husker RB) doesn’t make the top 4 or 5 on this list is because he had the disadvantage of most of his career coinciding with that of Rozier. If Roger would’ve been the feature back for 3 or 4 years he’d likely be widely considered just as high as Rozier.
And of course I prefer a combination of speed and toughness at the RB position. But I chose toughness/physicality over speed on the assumption that it had to be one or the other. Also it’s really dependent on the quality of the O line. With our better O lines, I would lean towards speed/quick backs. But with average to poor O lines, definitely the physical type back.
I posted this earlier this offseason, but we actually really did a good job in these scenarios. On 3rd and short rushes, we converted on 27 of 35 for an average of 5.94 yards.
Wisconsin converted on 20 of 34 for 3.21 as a comparison.
Do you have a link to those stats? I'd be really curious.
I know we were very bad at those early in the year. Perhaps we got better as the year went on but I would not have guessed that much.