ESPY said:
Are you saying we have Heisman-caliber QBs and RBs on this team? I'm just saying Lee, Green, Helu, nor any other skill position players on this team are Heisman-caliber. I agree though, the O-line is important to our success. I just don't see us going from what we were last season to the upper echelon of offensive prowess this season.
No, not at all. I'm simply pointing out that OU had a Heisman caliber QB, and he got hurt in 2009 because they graduated most of their OL from their 2008 team. Is it a coincidence that OU had one of their worst seasons under Stoops and that they had an extremely inexperienced pourous OL? If you have a poor OL, it doesn't matter if superman is in the backfield. If you have a poor DL, your LB's and secondary are going to look bad as well. Football games are won in the trenches. We could have had Frazier QBing this past year, and one of two things would have happened. 1) he would have looked average at best or 2) he would have gotten hurt. The success of Nebraska in 2010 all hinges upon the OL.
It does hinge on the OL, but if we lose, say, Marcel Jones. We put in DJ Jones instead. If we lose Mike Caputo. Well, that'd be interesting because I don't know who goes in there, maybe a RFr who has a chance to hold up. Or Ricky Henry? It wouldn't be any worse than losing Keith Williams, probably our best OL. It's true that our success hinges on the OL play, but any one of those guys do not individually affect things as much as Zac Lee, I think. So losing one of those guys, depending on which, would be pretty bad. Comparable, mostly, to losing another one of the guys. But losing Zac and having to put a #2 in there probably affects the O the most negatively.