Who else is all for...

EZ-E said:
caveman99 said:
Husker4lif3 said:
dylan said:
No. It would favor schools in talent rich areas and the rich would just get richer.
Click to expand...
Yep thats what im thinking. Bad idea, we get people from visits, not from instate. This would hurt us
Click to expand...
Yeah I don't like this either.
Click to expand...
Im not saying it would have to be in August. The basketball signing period started last wednesday I believe. One in November one in February???
Click to expand...
seems like some kids aren't able to make many visits until after the season, and with playoffs, that can stretch into november. i guess i'd be alright with an early signing on december 1st, but i don't see a big need for it.

 
I don’t think earlier recruiting would favor the rich. Texas, Florida and USC are going to get pretty much whoever they go after. Signing earlier would force them to make an earlier decision—with less information. It could work to our advantage.

 
It's not like it'll be manditory for the players to sign earlier. It just gives the people who know where they want to go the option to sign at a place so they don't have other colleges trying to sway them throughout the season when they want to be focusing on their high school academics and athletics.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top