Can't even be bothered to look up the guys name in these tweet rumors now :lol:6.5 mil for a staff. If true that would be awesome.
The D line coach from A&M is a recruiter of the year type guy.
There are alot of done deals here lately.Can't even be bothered to look up the guys name in these tweet rumors now :lol:
And each one is unique from the rest.There are alot of done deals here lately.
But why would Carolina agree to that deal? Rhule/Carolina hold most of the bargaining power.
That’s what I’m talkin bout…..sort of :lol:
Didn't Riley get some crazy low ball salary after he got fired and we still had to pay?Carolina has very little bargaining power, as their contract is signed and dried. As long as it's a FMV deal, Carolina can do jacksquat about it. The rumored issue was he was taking less than FMV guaranteed and loading up on bonuses, which doesn't reduce what Carolina would owe since it's not his base salary and that opens up potential litigation to reimburse Carolina to FMV. It's hard to determine what is FMV, a lot of different metrics could be used to determine it. As long as his contract isn't loaded with a high percentage of bonuses or isn't obscenely low, Carolina has no say. The issue is, trying to incentivize Rhule with bonuses, but not breaking the bank on base salary to keep out of litigation.
Yep. Carolina has next to no leverage considering they’re already on the hook for $40M. Rhule has the most leverage because he doesn’t have to do a thing to collect that 40. I think Nebraska is in a very good position to get it done. I could be wrong but I think it’s already done.With the guaranteed money Rhule has most of the leverage. Nebraska (or other interested party) has leverage too as they are in a position to lessen the burden on Carolina.
Carolina has leverage in that they know Nebraska is interested. They have the least leverage. That leverage is lessened the more viable options Nebraska has (Fickell, Etc).
Knowing that Rhule wants to coach gives them some leverage there.
It’s reduced to three parties winning or the three parties altogether losing.
There’s a good chance of resolution in my opinion.
Not sure you could say Riley was ever lowballed on a contract unless he was paying the team to let him coach.Didn't Riley get some crazy low ball salary after he got fired and we still had to pay?
I mean yes much of this is true, but Carolina actually could have quite a bit of influence, if his contract was written in the way these often are (which none of us really know). Carolina is the one with the offsetting language to recoup most if not all of that $40 million should he be hired. Same goes for @M.A. 's response.Carolina has very little bargaining power, as their contract is signed and dried. As long as it's a FMV deal, Carolina can do jacksquat about it. The rumored issue was he was taking less than FMV guaranteed and loading up on bonuses, which doesn't reduce what Carolina would owe since it's not his base salary and that opens up potential litigation to reimburse Carolina to FMV. It's hard to determine what is FMV, a lot of different metrics could be used to determine it. As long as his contract isn't loaded with a high percentage of bonuses or isn't obscenely low, Carolina has no say. The issue is, trying to incentivize Rhule with bonuses, but not breaking the bank on base salary to keep out of litigation.
Didn't Riley get some crazy low ball salary after he got fired and we still had to pay?