husker rob said:
sCrUmptious! said:
husker rob said:
vote now and show sCUm fans what NU fans really think of the "Rivalry" that was created in the mind of one man.
How is this even mildly relevant? I don't think any CU fans are under the impression that you'd rather play us than Oklahoma, so what's the point?
Vote now and show these MIT students that the world is not flat, but rather a sphere!
it is relevant bacause the all time series with OU is pretty close with OU having the edge by about 7 or 8 games over almost 90 years.
where as the series with sCUm is so lopsided, something like 44-17-2 give or take a couple games, yet you think it is a rivalry
Well the rivalry really only started with McCartney, so the last 20 years of the record are really all that's relevant to the series in a "rivalry" context (though you're obviously free to throw our 1898 context into the mix if you really want to). Over those 20 years, Nebraska leads the series 12 to 6, with a tie in 1991.
The games in 88, 89, 91(tie), 93, 96, 97, 98, 99, 00, and 04 were all decided by a touchdown or less, with Nebraska winning 7 of those 9 games (98, 99, and 00 coming as losses to CU in particularly excruciating fashion). If CU gets one or two breaks in those games (a receiver doesn't drop a pass, a kicker doesn't lay out the worst squib kick in the history of mankind, etc) the season series over that time could easily be split 9 to 9, or even fall to CU's favor.
The point of what I'm getting at is this: The 100+ years of CU/NU games are clearly lopsided, but the history of the actual rivalry (mid 80's through present) has been absolutely spectacular. Half the games being decided by 7 or fewer points, classic finishes, program defining wins (01 for CU, and don't even try to act like 94 didn't mean a lot in Lincoln), and a lot of good old fashioned American disdain shared between the two fan bases.
Yeah, it's not Oklahoma... whatever. I love this rivalry for what it is, regardless of whether you want to complain about it for what it isn't.