I will say a couple things: The name I alluded to earlier is NOT the same as the person being named in this round of Twitter rumors. I think it is wise to take all this with a huge grain of salt. The so-called accused, on the latest Twitter-fest, has a lot on the line. Reputation, credibility, an income, probably a family, and a future career.
Until UTTERLY INDISPUTABLE proof emerges, I would suggest we all stay far, far away from this. The risk of damage to an innocent person is far too great.
If my original sources and ideas are later proved to be correct, I will happily share my proof from that time, which is irrefutable--but only irrefutable if it is correct.