Rochelobe
Banned
I think _some_ programs are implementing a good testing protocol. Wasn't there a story about how South Dakota State will not test (due to budget costs)? That may be moot if Nebraska ends up with a conference only schedule. I guess I would like to see the NCAA implement a "no testing - no playing" rule. I realize that would probably make (some/several) non-P5 schools unlikely to play, but I think it would be a reasonable requirement to levy on schools that want to field a team.Personally I think players will be safer if they are playing due to routine testing. If we’ve learned anything about that demographic, it’s that they’re not prone to be cautious.
as far as I can tell, sports programs are making a great effort to test.
However, I think one difference between what we would have with college football vs pro sports (both in the US and Europe) is that it will probably be harder to put college athletes in a bubble the same way as they are doing with the professional athletes. This would most likely lead to higher cases of positive tests thus leading to forfeits. Even if only 4 or 5 players test positive, if it is all of your QBs, due to having to be in the same meetings, etc., would you actually still play a game that week?
If they decide to not have on campus courses, that would help - house the players, they are there for practice and to play and do their coursework online. That would probably go a long way toward lowering the risk.