These discussions often get turned on their head this way. Yes, "not all men" do this, and men, too, can get harassed. Those are important issues
too...
So we're talking about what fraction of men she encountered that said these things to her? At 1,000 men per hour, that's less than two percent of the men she encounters say such things. It's a negligible percentage at best.
Negligible in the discussion of "how many men do this", not "is this a problem for the person on the receiving end or not", of course. Having to respond to such scenarios from passers-by in public is easily orders of magnitude more of an issue for women than men.
This experiment didn't label all men as harassers. It attempts to shed light on an issue that many (not all) women encounter regularly, when they don't want to and don't choose to.
I agree with all the stuff in your post that I deleted, so I deleted it to talk about this.
I don't per se disagree with any of this. And you're definitely correct in that the level of harassment women receive from men is "orders of magnitude" greater than what men receive from women - that may even be an understatement.
What I don't agree with (and this is all grey area) is that this thing doesn't label "all men" as harassers. It says "Women" face this kind of harassment, and the 100% incontrovertible insinuation is that Men are the perpetrators.
I can't specifically disagree with that. Nobody commenting or reading here is stupid - we all know the "S" women face out there. I've looked at a woman in a way that's made her uncomfortable, and likely we all have. Sometimes women just don't want to be looked at. Pretty ones especially - they get it ALL THE TIME. It's flattering, but there's a limit to it. Like the 'knapplc is old' joke - it's funny, it's meant to be humorous and nobody who says it is being an a$$, but the damned joke is OLD. It annoys me now. I can extrapolate the feeling women have from the looks - even the well-meaning ones - from that.
But that doesn't mean that "Men" who look at or even talk to "Women" are harassing. And this video... if ALL of that is "harassment," then I would never have married my wife, because I told her before we dated that she was beautiful, and... we kinda started dating after that.
A lot of what we saw on that video wasn't harassment. "I just saw a thousand dollars." I've gotten that crap from street vendors myself, and I ain't pretty.
That guy walking alongside her for five minutes? That was creepy as hell and that guy needs to figure out some basic life issues there.
But two of the first four guys on that video say nothing to her.
I counted seven guys in the camera shot in the second instance - only one of whom 'harassed' her.
There were seven guys in the third shot (Hey what's up girl? How you doin?) and two harassed her.
There were another seven guys in the fourth shot (Damn!) and one harassed her. Also - what's up with seven guys in the shot? Weird!
Two in the next shot (Hey baby!) and one harassed her.
Three in the next shot (Hey, beautiful!) and one harassed her.
Two in the next shot (How you doin' this morning?) and one harassed her.
Three in the next shot (Have a nice evening) and one harassed her.
Two and one in the next shot
Three in the next shot, and the DAMN! harasser is (apparently) off-camera.
Four in the next shot (American Eagle) and one harassed her.
The next shot is the creepy five-minute guy. Nobody is going to deny that this guy is freaky and bad news. Ick.
I could go on. These are very specific instances of very specific kinds of people, people who misunderstand boundaries or have no boundaries. These people harass women - but they are the kind of people who harass "people," too. I lived in San Francisco two years, worked on Market Street. Walking to my office from parking every morning, walking to lunch, walking back to parking every night - I got harassed by these people. It was different harassment (Hey man! Give me a dollar!) but it was harassment.
Sexual harassment is FAR more personal and invasive than the vague "give me a dollar!" harassment I got. I'm some biggish dude that nobody is going to sexually harass, so I can't know what these women go through. But they're not alone. Harassers are harassers and they harass everybody.
My gripe with this piece isn't that this woman wasn't harassed - if she thought she was, she was. My gripe is that it shows nothing we didn't already know, it casts a broad cloth over a very grey-area problem, and it doesn't do one single thing to fix this problem.
And frankly, even though everyone with a sane mind wishes this wasn't a problem, we're thousands of years of evolution from it going away. Maybe tens of thousands, if not millions. Broad-cloth generalities like this don't fix this problem.
And that's a problem.