Would Oklahoma have won with bradford and gresham?

[AngryHusker88]

They should have won without them. If their passes would have been on target, we would not have won this game. Our defense took advantage of what their offense gave them. If they wouldn't have been so generous on the offensive side, we still would have lost. If Bradford would have played, this probably would have been over at the half.

lol, ur funny

 

[BlackShirt1340]

I love how people manage to be so negative even after a win. With Bradford in, we still would have had a great chance to win.

PEOPLE.... We are watching one of the most impressive defenses in Nebraska history here...

Yes it may seem like I'm chugging the kool-aid, but after watching Nebraska football my entire life, who else can think of a time where our defense was in the top 11 and our offense was ranked in the bottom 3rd of the country?

Maybe 2003, but everyone with eyeballs can see that our defense is legit and is passed the days of being inconsistent. Like Knapp said... we are greedy SOBs who took what we wanted.

OH YEAH! :w00t :w00t :w00t

 

[Husker4lif3]

honestly i think we would have lost. Jones just didnt have it, and tell me a game that bradford threw four interceptions(not counting the last one since he didnt even care where that one went) in his career, too lazy to look but i bet he hasnt. Jones flinched when he got into the redzone, maybe it was our D, but i will say it was him, but i still love our D!!

And this is all what if, so no need to even waste energy typing on trying to argue.